1981•Managerial and Decision EconomicsRequires access

Unionism and the public sector

Charles W. Baird

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract It is incorrect and misleading to speak of unionization as a ‘human right’. The only human right is ‘self‐ownership’, i.e. to pursue goals with one's own abilities but with no force or fraud against others. Government cannot dispense rights, only privileges and protections to some at the expense of others. A minimal degree of coercion exercised by government is unavoidable. But labor unions are not governments. Government has granted significant privileges to unions in the private sector, but such are not appropriate for public sector unions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract It is incorrect and misleading to speak of unionization as a ‘human right’. The only human right is ‘self‐ownership’, i.e. to pursue goals with one's own abilities but with no force or fraud against others. Government cannot dispense rights, only privileges and protections to some at the expense of others. A minimal degree of coercion exercised by government is unavoidable. But labor unions are not governments. Government has granted significant privileges to unions in the private sector, but such are not appropriate for public sector unions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract It is incorrect and misleading to speak of unionization as a ‘human right’. The only human right is ‘self‐ownership’, i.e. to pursue goals with one's own abilities but with no force or fraud against others. Government cannot dispense rights, only privileges and protections to some at the expense of others. A minimal degree of coercion exercised by government is unavoidable. But labor unions are not governments. Government has granted significant privileges to unions in the private sector, but such are not appropriate for public sector unions.

Key concepts: Coercion (linguistics), Government (linguistics), Public sector, Private sector, Business, Public ownership, Labour economics, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Unionism and the public sector — Research Paper | ScholarLens