2001New England Journal of MedicineRequires access

Doxycycline for Tick Bites — Not for Everyone

Eugene D. Shapiro

Open publisher page 61 citations

Abstract

Recently, a panel of experts of the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommended that persons bitten by deer ticks (Ixodes scapularis) should not routinely receive antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis.1 This recommendation was based on an assessment of the risks and the consequences of Lyme disease, as well as the costs, adverse effects, and efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Should those recommendations change after the report in this issue of the Journal by Nadelman et al. of a well-designed trial in which a single dose of doxycycline was 87 percent effective in preventing Lyme disease?2 The results of the study confirm that . . .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recently, a panel of experts of the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommended that persons bitten by deer ticks (Ixodes scapularis) should not routinely receive antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis.1 This recommendation was based on an assessment of the risks and the consequences of Lyme disease, as well as the costs, adverse effects, and efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Should those recommendations change after the report in this issue of the Journal by Nadelman et al. of a well-designed trial in which a single dose of doxycycline was 87 percent effective in preventing Lyme disease?2 The results of the study confirm that . . .

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 61 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recently, a panel of experts of the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommended that persons bitten by deer ticks (Ixodes scapularis) should not routinely receive antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis.1 This recommendation was based on an assessment of the risks and the consequences of Lyme disease, as well as the costs, adverse effects, and efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Should those recommendations change after the report in this issue of the Journal by Nadelman et al. of a well-designed trial in which a single dose of doxycycline was 87 percent effective in preventing Lyme disease?2 The results of the study confirm that . . .

Key concepts: Doxycycline, Medicine, Ixodes scapularis, Lyme disease, LYME, Chemoprophylaxis, Tick, Tick-borne disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Doxycycline for Tick Bites — Not for Everyone — Research Paper | ScholarLens