INCORPORATING URBAN DESIGN VARIABLES IN METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS' TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS
R W Eash
Abstract
R W Eash
Abstract
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) find it difficult to address urban design issues in their work programs for both technical and policy reasons. There are emerging arguments for MPOs staff to take the relationship between urban design and travel demand more seriously. Air quality conformity requirements that MPOs face provide an incentive to include urban design variables. Transit interests have also keyed on the relationship between urban design and transit ridership. Those who argue that the travel demand models need to be responsive to urban design variables expect urban design to influence travel behavior in the following manner: 1. increase transit ridership by reducing the access/egress distances for transit; 2. substitute nonmotorized trips for vehicle trips; 3. shorten trip lengths; 4. increase transit ridership by altering travel patterns; and 5. alter trip generation. This paper discusses each of the above travel behavior influences, and elaborates with model results.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) find it difficult to address urban design issues in their work programs for both technical and policy reasons. There are emerging arguments for MPOs staff to take the relationship between urban design and travel demand more seriously. Air quality conformity requirements that MPOs face provide an incentive to include urban design variables. Transit interests have also keyed on the relationship between urban design and transit ridership. Those who argue that the travel demand models need to be responsive to urban design variables expect urban design to influence travel behavior in the following manner: 1. increase transit ridership by reducing the access/egress distances for transit; 2. substitute nonmotorized trips for vehicle trips; 3. shorten trip lengths; 4. increase transit ridership by altering travel patterns; and 5. alter trip generation. This paper discusses each of the above travel behavior influences, and elaborates with model results.
Key concepts: Metropolitan area, TRIPS architecture, Transport engineering, Transit (satellite), Business, Incentive, Work (physics), Trip generation