1996Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Evaluating Weaving Section Designs Using INTEGRATION

John A. Stewart, Matthew Baker, M Van Aerde

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

The current design procedure shown in Calculation 6 of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) requires an exhaustive analysis of a family of possible solutions. The design is selected on the basis of minimum speeds of weaving and nonweaving vehicles for different levels of service. In this paper the use of the INTEGRATION modeling tool to evaluate the same family of possible solutions is examined. Because INTEGRATION has the ability to determine volumes in addition to speeds, it was used to select the design solution based on the ratio of demand volume to capacity. Both procedures determined that five-lane Type B weaving sections greater than 610 m (2,000 ft) in length would provide level-of-service C for the origin-destination demand pattern found in Example Calculation 6 in Chapter 4 of the HCM. Analysis of the design results also showed that the number of lanes in the core area was the most critical factor in determining weaving section capacity. The length of the core area was also found to have an impact but was less important as core length increased. Finally, the type of weaving section was found to have the least impact on capacity, especially at core areas longer than 305 m (1,000 ft).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The current design procedure shown in Calculation 6 of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) requires an exhaustive analysis of a family of possible solutions. The design is selected on the basis of minimum speeds of weaving and nonweaving vehicles for different levels of service. In this paper the use of the INTEGRATION modeling tool to evaluate the same family of possible solutions is examined. Because INTEGRATION has the ability to determine volumes in addition to speeds, it was used to select the design solution based on the ratio of demand volume to capacity. Both procedures determined that five-lane Type B weaving sections greater than 610 m (2,000 ft) in length would provide level-of-service C for the origin-destination demand pattern found in Example Calculation 6 in Chapter 4 of the HCM. Analysis of the design results also showed that the number of lanes in the core area was the most critical factor in determining weaving section capacity. The length of the core area was also found to have an impact but was less important as core length increased. Finally, the type of weaving section was found to have the least impact on capacity, especially at core areas longer than 305 m (1,000 ft).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The current design procedure shown in Calculation 6 of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) requires an exhaustive analysis of a family of possible solutions. The design is selected on the basis of minimum speeds of weaving and nonweaving vehicles for different levels of service. In this paper the use of the INTEGRATION modeling tool to evaluate the same family of possible solutions is examined. Because INTEGRATION has the ability to determine volumes in addition to speeds, it was used to select the design solution based on the ratio of demand volume to capacity. Both procedures determined that five-lane Type B weaving sections greater than 610 m (2,000 ft) in length would provide level-of-service C for the origin-destination demand pattern found in Example Calculation 6 in Chapter 4 of the HCM. Analysis of the design results also showed that the number of lanes in the core area was the most critical factor in determining weaving section capacity. The length of the core area was also found to have an impact but was less important as core length increased. Finally, the type of weaving section was found to have the least impact on capacity, especially at core areas longer than 305 m (1,000 ft).

Key concepts: Weaving, Section (typography), Highway Capacity Manual, Core (optical fiber), Service (business), Level of service, Computer science, Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating Weaving Section Designs Using INTEGRATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens