1998Clinical Pharmacology & TherapeuticsRequires access

The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation*

Michael Hale, Andrew Nicholls, Roy Bullingham, Ronald J. Hené, A. J. Hoitsma, Jean‐Paul Squifflet, Willem Weimar, Yves Vanrenterghem, Fokko J. Van de Woude, Gert A. Verpooten

Open publisher page 400 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil, a pro-drug for mycophenolic acid, reduces the likelihood of allograft rejection after renal transplantation. We studied the relationship between mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics and the likelihood of rejection in a randomized concentration-controlled trial. METHODS: Under double-blind conditions, recipients of kidney transplants were followed for evidence of allograft rejection for 6 months. In addition to mycophenolate mofetil, patients received usual doses of cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) and corticosteroids. The dose of mycophenolate mofetil (given twice daily) was controlled by feedback, with mycophenolic acid area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) as the controlled variable. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 target AUC groups. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis showed a significant (P < .0001) relationship between mycophenolic acid AUC and the likelihood of rejection. High mycophenolic acid values were associated with a very low probability of rejection. An AUC of 15 micrograms.h/mL yielded 50% of maximal achievable efficacy with a 4% change of efficacy for a 1 microgram.h/mL change in AUC at the midpoint of the logistic curve. Exploratory analyses showed other variables (e.g., the maximum observed plasma concentration, predose plasma concentration, and drug dose) had poorer predictive power for the rejection outcome. Bivariate regression confirmed the importance of AUC as a highly predictive variable and showed low predictive value of other variables, once the contribution of AUC had been considered. The characteristic side effects of mycophenolate mofetil therapy appeared related to drug dose but not to mycophenolic acid concentration. CONCLUSIONS: The AUC of mycophenolic acid is predictive of the likelihood of allograft rejection after renal transplantation in patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil, a pro-drug for mycophenolic acid, reduces the likelihood of allograft rejection after renal transplantation. We studied the relationship between mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics and the likelihood of rejection in a randomized concentration-controlled trial. METHODS: Under double-blind conditions, recipients of kidney transplants were followed for evidence of allograft rejection for 6 months. In addition to mycophenolate mofetil, patients received usual doses of cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) and corticosteroids. The dose of mycophenolate mofetil (given twice daily) was controlled by feedback, with mycophenolic acid area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) as the controlled variable. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 target AUC groups. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis showed a significant (P < .0001) relationship between mycophenolic acid AUC and the likelihood of rejection. High mycophenolic acid values were associated with a very low probability of rejection. An AUC of 15 micrograms.h/mL yielded 50% of maximal achievable efficacy with a 4% change of efficacy for a 1 microgram.h/mL change in AUC at the midpoint of the logistic curve. Exploratory analyses showed other variables (e.g., the maximum observed plasma concentration, predose plasma concentration, and drug dose) had poorer predictive power for the rejection outcome. Bivariate regression confirmed the importance of AUC as a highly predictive variable and showed low predictive value of other variables, once the contribution of AUC had been considered. The characteristic side effects of mycophenolate mofetil therapy appeared related to drug dose but not to mycophenolic acid concentration. CONCLUSIONS: The AUC of mycophenolic acid is predictive of the likelihood of allograft rejection after renal transplantation in patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 400 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil, a pro-drug for mycophenolic acid, reduces the likelihood of allograft rejection after renal transplantation. We studied the relationship between mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics and the likelihood of rejection in a randomized concentration-controlled trial. METHODS: Under double-blind conditions, recipients of kidney transplants were followed for evidence of allograft rejection for 6 months. In addition to mycophenolate mofetil, patients received usual doses of cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) and corticosteroids. The dose of mycophenolate mofetil (given twice daily) was controlled by feedback, with mycophenolic acid area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) as the controlled variable. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 target AUC groups. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis showed a significant (P < .0001) relationship between mycophenolic acid AUC and the likelihood of rejection. High mycophenolic acid values were associated with a very low probability of rejection. An AUC of 15 micrograms.h/mL yielded 50% of maximal achievable efficacy with a 4% change of efficacy for a 1 microgram.h/mL change in AUC at the midpoint of the logistic curve. Exploratory analyses showed other variables (e.g., the maximum observed plasma concentration, predose plasma concentration, and drug dose) had poorer predictive power for the rejection outcome. Bivariate regression confirmed the importance of AUC as a highly predictive variable and showed low predictive value of other variables, once the contribution of AUC had been considered. The characteristic side effects of mycophenolate mofetil therapy appeared related to drug dose but not to mycophenolic acid concentration. CONCLUSIONS: The AUC of mycophenolic acid is predictive of the likelihood of allograft rejection after renal transplantation in patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil.

Key concepts: Mycophenolic acid, Mycophenolate, Area under the curve, Pharmacokinetics, Medicine, Transplantation, Pharmacology, Pharmacodynamics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation* — Research Paper | ScholarLens