2006PEDIATRICSRequires access

What Pediatricians Should Know About Child-Related Malpractice Payments in the United States

Zeev N. Kain, Alison A. Caldwell-Andrews

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine child-related National Practitioner Data Bank data. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Practitioner Data Bank. RESULTS: the period from February 1, 2004, through December 31, 2005, a total of 30195 malpractice payments were made on behalf of practitioners in the United States; 14% of those payments (4107 of 30,195 payments) were child related. During the period analyzed, $1.73 billion were paid for malpractice cases involving children. More than 95% of all payments were the result of settlements and only approximately 5% the result of judgments. The average child-related malpractice payment was significantly greater than an adult-related malpractice payment ($422,000 vs $247,000); however, child-related malpractice payments were only one half as likely to occur, compared with adult-related malpractice payments. Significant geographic variability was found in the numbers and sizes of child-related malpractice payments. Failure to diagnose was the leading reason for child-related payments (18%), followed by improper performance (9%), delay in diagnosis (9%), and improper management (6%). Finally, we found that approximately 40% of all malpractice awards were the result of surgical or obstetrical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Practicing pediatricians should be aware of the existence of a mandatory electronic depository that documents all malpractice settlements and judgments involving practitioners.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine child-related National Practitioner Data Bank data. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Practitioner Data Bank. RESULTS: the period from February 1, 2004, through December 31, 2005, a total of 30195 malpractice payments were made on behalf of practitioners in the United States; 14% of those payments (4107 of 30,195 payments) were child related. During the period analyzed, $1.73 billion were paid for malpractice cases involving children. More than 95% of all payments were the result of settlements and only approximately 5% the result of judgments. The average child-related malpractice payment was significantly greater than an adult-related malpractice payment ($422,000 vs $247,000); however, child-related malpractice payments were only one half as likely to occur, compared with adult-related malpractice payments. Significant geographic variability was found in the numbers and sizes of child-related malpractice payments. Failure to diagnose was the leading reason for child-related payments (18%), followed by improper performance (9%), delay in diagnosis (9%), and improper management (6%). Finally, we found that approximately 40% of all malpractice awards were the result of surgical or obstetrical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Practicing pediatricians should be aware of the existence of a mandatory electronic depository that documents all malpractice settlements and judgments involving practitioners.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine child-related National Practitioner Data Bank data. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Practitioner Data Bank. RESULTS: the period from February 1, 2004, through December 31, 2005, a total of 30195 malpractice payments were made on behalf of practitioners in the United States; 14% of those payments (4107 of 30,195 payments) were child related. During the period analyzed, $1.73 billion were paid for malpractice cases involving children. More than 95% of all payments were the result of settlements and only approximately 5% the result of judgments. The average child-related malpractice payment was significantly greater than an adult-related malpractice payment ($422,000 vs $247,000); however, child-related malpractice payments were only one half as likely to occur, compared with adult-related malpractice payments. Significant geographic variability was found in the numbers and sizes of child-related malpractice payments. Failure to diagnose was the leading reason for child-related payments (18%), followed by improper performance (9%), delay in diagnosis (9%), and improper management (6%). Finally, we found that approximately 40% of all malpractice awards were the result of surgical or obstetrical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Practicing pediatricians should be aware of the existence of a mandatory electronic depository that documents all malpractice settlements and judgments involving practitioners.

Key concepts: Malpractice, Payment, Medicine, Family medicine, Human settlement, Medical malpractice, Actuarial science, Pediatrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What Pediatricians Should Know About Child-Related Malpractice Payments in the United States — Research Paper | ScholarLens