1982Poultry ScienceOpen access

The Influence of Genetic Increases in Body Weight on the Abdominal Fat Pad of Turkeys

K.E. Nestor

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

A strain (F) in which 16-week body weight had been increased 2.22 and 2.00 kg in males and females, respectively, after 14 generations of selection for increased 16-week body weight was compared with its corresponding randombred control (RBC2) for weight of the abdominal fat pad at 20 weeks of age. At 20 weeks of age, body weight of the F strain was 2.58 and 2.23 kg greater for males and females, respectively, than that of the RBC2 strain. The comparison was made on offspring in three weekly hatches. Because different buildings were used for the hatches, the effects of hatches and buildings were confounded. The increase in body weight of the F strain was associated with an increase in the size of the abdominal fat pad (both actual weight and weight expressed as percent of live body weight). The abdominal fat pad was larger in females than in males. Hatch (building) effects and the interaction of strain and hatch were significant sources of variation in abdominal fat pad weight. The linear regression coefficients of abdominal fat pad weight on body weight differed between sexes and strains. The coefficients were larger for the F strain than the RBC2 strain and were higher for females than for males.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A strain (F) in which 16-week body weight had been increased 2.22 and 2.00 kg in males and females, respectively, after 14 generations of selection for increased 16-week body weight was compared with its corresponding randombred control (RBC2) for weight of the abdominal fat pad at 20 weeks of age. At 20 weeks of age, body weight of the F strain was 2.58 and 2.23 kg greater for males and females, respectively, than that of the RBC2 strain. The comparison was made on offspring in three weekly hatches. Because different buildings were used for the hatches, the effects of hatches and buildings were confounded. The increase in body weight of the F strain was associated with an increase in the size of the abdominal fat pad (both actual weight and weight expressed as percent of live body weight). The abdominal fat pad was larger in females than in males. Hatch (building) effects and the interaction of strain and hatch were significant sources of variation in abdominal fat pad weight. The linear regression coefficients of abdominal fat pad weight on body weight differed between sexes and strains. The coefficients were larger for the F strain than the RBC2 strain and were higher for females than for males.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A strain (F) in which 16-week body weight had been increased 2.22 and 2.00 kg in males and females, respectively, after 14 generations of selection for increased 16-week body weight was compared with its corresponding randombred control (RBC2) for weight of the abdominal fat pad at 20 weeks of age. At 20 weeks of age, body weight of the F strain was 2.58 and 2.23 kg greater for males and females, respectively, than that of the RBC2 strain. The comparison was made on offspring in three weekly hatches. Because different buildings were used for the hatches, the effects of hatches and buildings were confounded. The increase in body weight of the F strain was associated with an increase in the size of the abdominal fat pad (both actual weight and weight expressed as percent of live body weight). The abdominal fat pad was larger in females than in males. Hatch (building) effects and the interaction of strain and hatch were significant sources of variation in abdominal fat pad weight. The linear regression coefficients of abdominal fat pad weight on body weight differed between sexes and strains. The coefficients were larger for the F strain than the RBC2 strain and were higher for females than for males.

Key concepts: Abdominal fat, Body weight, Offspring, Strain (injury), Animal science, Fat pad, Biology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Influence of Genetic Increases in Body Weight on the Abdominal Fat Pad of Turkeys — Research Paper | ScholarLens