1995Marriage & Family ReviewRequires access

Cohabitation and the Law

Monica A. Seff

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

In the eyes of the law, cohabitation is not the legal equivalent of marriage or common-law marriage. This review ex- amines the extent of heterosexual cohabitation in the United States and judicial responses to issues raised by couples who have chosen nonmarital cohabitation. Issues examined include the effect of non- marital cohabitation on the institution of marriage, contemporary legal considerations in cohabitation, the use of cohabitation con- tracts, and key legal differences between cohabitation and marriage. Since state laws have not established cohabitation as a legal relation- ship, the rights of cohabitors have been established through court decisions. Consequently, cohabitors are likely to find themselves in a position of uncertainty with respect to their legal rights. Three legal approaches to cohabitation are discussed and several issues that still need to be addressed by the law are reviewed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the eyes of the law, cohabitation is not the legal equivalent of marriage or common-law marriage. This review ex- amines the extent of heterosexual cohabitation in the United States and judicial responses to issues raised by couples who have chosen nonmarital cohabitation. Issues examined include the effect of non- marital cohabitation on the institution of marriage, contemporary legal considerations in cohabitation, the use of cohabitation con- tracts, and key legal differences between cohabitation and marriage. Since state laws have not established cohabitation as a legal relation- ship, the rights of cohabitors have been established through court decisions. Consequently, cohabitors are likely to find themselves in a position of uncertainty with respect to their legal rights. Three legal approaches to cohabitation are discussed and several issues that still need to be addressed by the law are reviewed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the eyes of the law, cohabitation is not the legal equivalent of marriage or common-law marriage. This review ex- amines the extent of heterosexual cohabitation in the United States and judicial responses to issues raised by couples who have chosen nonmarital cohabitation. Issues examined include the effect of non- marital cohabitation on the institution of marriage, contemporary legal considerations in cohabitation, the use of cohabitation con- tracts, and key legal differences between cohabitation and marriage. Since state laws have not established cohabitation as a legal relation- ship, the rights of cohabitors have been established through court decisions. Consequently, cohabitors are likely to find themselves in a position of uncertainty with respect to their legal rights. Three legal approaches to cohabitation are discussed and several issues that still need to be addressed by the law are reviewed.

Key concepts: Cohabitation, Sociology, Psychology, Social psychology, Criminology, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cohabitation and the Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens