Effects of Hypophysiotropic Factors on Growth Hormone and Prolactin Secretion from Somatotroph Adenomas in Culture

In an attempt to characterize GH and PRL secretion in acromegaly, the effects of various stimuli on GH and PRL release by cultured pituitary adenoma cells derived from acromegalic patients were studied. In addition, the PRL responses of somatotroph adenoma cells were compared to those of prolactinoma cells. GH-releasing hormone-(1-44) (GHRH) consistently stimulated GH secretion in all 14 somatotroph adenomas studied in a dose-dependent manner. The sensitivity as well as the magnitude of the GH responses to GHRH were highly variable in individual tissues. Somatotroph adenomas that did not respond to dopamine were more sensitive and had greater GH responses to GHRH. In 8 of 9 somatotroph adenomas that concomitantly secreted PRL, the addition of GHRH likewise increased PRL release. Omission of extracellular Ca2+ blocked the stimulatory effect of GHRH on GH and PRL secretion. When cells were coincubated with 0.1 nM somatostatin, GH and PRL secretion induced by 10 nM GHRH were completely blocked in most adenomas. Similarly, coincubation of dopamine resulted in inhibition of GHRH-induced hormone secretion in some adenomas. Addition of TRH to the incubation medium, on the other hand, significantly stimulated GH secretion in 8 of 14 adenomas, while TRH stimulated PRL release in all of the adenomas. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) produced an increase in GH and PRL secretion in other adenomas. In prolactinoma cells, somatostatin and dopamine unequivocally suppressed PRL secretion; however, other stimuli including GHRH, VIP, and CRF were ineffective. TRH induced a significant increase in PRL secretion in only one prolactinoma. These results suggest that responsiveness to GHRH and somatostatin is preserved in somatotroph adenomas; the responsiveness to GHRH is inversely correlated to that to dopamine; and PRL cells associated with somatotroph adenomas possess characteristics similar to those of GH cells. Further, the GH stimulatory actions of TRH and VIP are different.