1973•Social ProblemsRequires access

Embourgeoisement in Indianapolis?

James DeFronzo

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The embourgeoisement thesis was examined in Indianapolis for blue-collar workers in general and skilled blue-collar workers in particular with regard to a wide range of political, social and economic variables. The findings did not support the embourgeoisement thesis and marked blue-collar–white-collar differences were found, especially with regard to economic attitudes and domestic political attitudes and behavior. An analysis of covariance revealed that difference in years of education was most generally responsible for blue-collar–white-collar differences, while difference in occupation, racial composition, and income levels accounted for some of the blue-collar–white-collar differences. Occupation was found to account independently for only a few of the observed attitudinal and behavioral differences between blue-collar and white-collar workers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The embourgeoisement thesis was examined in Indianapolis for blue-collar workers in general and skilled blue-collar workers in particular with regard to a wide range of political, social and economic variables. The findings did not support the embourgeoisement thesis and marked blue-collar–white-collar differences were found, especially with regard to economic attitudes and domestic political attitudes and behavior. An analysis of covariance revealed that difference in years of education was most generally responsible for blue-collar–white-collar differences, while difference in occupation, racial composition, and income levels accounted for some of the blue-collar–white-collar differences. Occupation was found to account independently for only a few of the observed attitudinal and behavioral differences between blue-collar and white-collar workers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The embourgeoisement thesis was examined in Indianapolis for blue-collar workers in general and skilled blue-collar workers in particular with regard to a wide range of political, social and economic variables. The findings did not support the embourgeoisement thesis and marked blue-collar–white-collar differences were found, especially with regard to economic attitudes and domestic political attitudes and behavior. An analysis of covariance revealed that difference in years of education was most generally responsible for blue-collar–white-collar differences, while difference in occupation, racial composition, and income levels accounted for some of the blue-collar–white-collar differences. Occupation was found to account independently for only a few of the observed attitudinal and behavioral differences between blue-collar and white-collar workers.

Key concepts: Collar, Blue collar, White (mutation), Politics, Demographic economics, Psychology, Demography, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Embourgeoisement in Indianapolis? — Research Paper | ScholarLens