2013•Neurological ResearchRequires access

Value of multimodality monitoring using brainstem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials in endoscopic endonasal surgery

Parthasarathy D. Thirumala, Hemasree S Kodavatiganti, Miguel E. Habeych, Kelley Wichman, Yue‐Fang Chang, Paul A. Gardner, Carl Henry Snyderman, Donald J. Crammond, Jeffrey R. Balzer

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) using brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring to predict and/or prevent postoperative neurological deficits during endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES). METHODS: We retrospectively identified 138 consecutive patients who had BAEP monitoring in addition to SSEP monitoring during EES at our institution. We reviewed the postoperative clinical outcomes and neurophysiological changes independently. RESULTS: The total of number of patients with any IONM changes was 10. The incidence of BAEP changes was 3.62%. The incidence of SSEP changes was 3.62% as well. One patient had changes in both BAEPs and SSEPs. Majority of the changes were observed during changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) without any postoperative neurological deficits. There were two postoperative neurological deficits. DISCUSSION: BAEPs and SSEPs provide unique information about integrity of brainstem function during EES procedures involving tumors in the and around clival region. We advocate a comprehensive multimodality approach to IONM during EESs including BAEPs and SSEPs depending on the location of the neural structures at risk.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) using brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring to predict and/or prevent postoperative neurological deficits during endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES). METHODS: We retrospectively identified 138 consecutive patients who had BAEP monitoring in addition to SSEP monitoring during EES at our institution. We reviewed the postoperative clinical outcomes and neurophysiological changes independently. RESULTS: The total of number of patients with any IONM changes was 10. The incidence of BAEP changes was 3.62%. The incidence of SSEP changes was 3.62% as well. One patient had changes in both BAEPs and SSEPs. Majority of the changes were observed during changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) without any postoperative neurological deficits. There were two postoperative neurological deficits. DISCUSSION: BAEPs and SSEPs provide unique information about integrity of brainstem function during EES procedures involving tumors in the and around clival region. We advocate a comprehensive multimodality approach to IONM during EESs including BAEPs and SSEPs depending on the location of the neural structures at risk.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) using brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring to predict and/or prevent postoperative neurological deficits during endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES). METHODS: We retrospectively identified 138 consecutive patients who had BAEP monitoring in addition to SSEP monitoring during EES at our institution. We reviewed the postoperative clinical outcomes and neurophysiological changes independently. RESULTS: The total of number of patients with any IONM changes was 10. The incidence of BAEP changes was 3.62%. The incidence of SSEP changes was 3.62% as well. One patient had changes in both BAEPs and SSEPs. Majority of the changes were observed during changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) without any postoperative neurological deficits. There were two postoperative neurological deficits. DISCUSSION: BAEPs and SSEPs provide unique information about integrity of brainstem function during EES procedures involving tumors in the and around clival region. We advocate a comprehensive multimodality approach to IONM during EESs including BAEPs and SSEPs depending on the location of the neural structures at risk.

Key concepts: Somatosensory evoked potential, Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, Medicine, Brainstem, Anesthesia, Brainstem auditory evoked potential, Somatosensory system, Evoked potential

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Value of multimodality monitoring using brainstem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials in endoscopic endonasal surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens