1958•The Journal of Agricultural ScienceRequires access

A large-scale test of the effects of food restriction on the performance of fattening pigs

Robert M. Braude, M. Jill Townsend, Geoff Harrington, J. G. Rowell

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

1. A co-ordinated trial has been carried out at twenty-six centres to study the effects of feeding different quantities of food to fattening pigs. The treatments studied were ad lib. feeding throughout, ad lib. feeding to 120 lb. live weight after which the amount of food given was restricted to 6·5 lb./pig/day and two scales of feeding according to live weight, one moderate and one severe (Table 1). 2. Food conversion was best for the pigs on the most restricted feeding scale, being 8% better than that for the pigs fed ad lib. 3. The slower growing pigs were less fat, slightly longer and their depths of eye muscle were greater. 4. The ad lib. fed pigs had higher killing-out percentages and higher weights into cure. 5. The bacon sides from pigs fed on restricted diets yielded a higher proportion of gammon and fore-end and had thicker streaks. 6. Restriction of feeds led to softer fats. 7. An economic appraisal has been made which shows that, on the basis of certain assumptions, the medium feeding scale would have led to a smaller profit per year than the ad lib. or the ad lib. restricted treatments under the price structure and system of grading prevailing during the period of the experiment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1. A co-ordinated trial has been carried out at twenty-six centres to study the effects of feeding different quantities of food to fattening pigs. The treatments studied were ad lib. feeding throughout, ad lib. feeding to 120 lb. live weight after which the amount of food given was restricted to 6·5 lb./pig/day and two scales of feeding according to live weight, one moderate and one severe (Table 1). 2. Food conversion was best for the pigs on the most restricted feeding scale, being 8% better than that for the pigs fed ad lib. 3. The slower growing pigs were less fat, slightly longer and their depths of eye muscle were greater. 4. The ad lib. fed pigs had higher killing-out percentages and higher weights into cure. 5. The bacon sides from pigs fed on restricted diets yielded a higher proportion of gammon and fore-end and had thicker streaks. 6. Restriction of feeds led to softer fats. 7. An economic appraisal has been made which shows that, on the basis of certain assumptions, the medium feeding scale would have led to a smaller profit per year than the ad lib. or the ad lib. restricted treatments under the price structure and system of grading prevailing during the period of the experiment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1. A co-ordinated trial has been carried out at twenty-six centres to study the effects of feeding different quantities of food to fattening pigs. The treatments studied were ad lib. feeding throughout, ad lib. feeding to 120 lb. live weight after which the amount of food given was restricted to 6·5 lb./pig/day and two scales of feeding according to live weight, one moderate and one severe (Table 1). 2. Food conversion was best for the pigs on the most restricted feeding scale, being 8% better than that for the pigs fed ad lib. 3. The slower growing pigs were less fat, slightly longer and their depths of eye muscle were greater. 4. The ad lib. fed pigs had higher killing-out percentages and higher weights into cure. 5. The bacon sides from pigs fed on restricted diets yielded a higher proportion of gammon and fore-end and had thicker streaks. 6. Restriction of feeds led to softer fats. 7. An economic appraisal has been made which shows that, on the basis of certain assumptions, the medium feeding scale would have led to a smaller profit per year than the ad lib. or the ad lib. restricted treatments under the price structure and system of grading prevailing during the period of the experiment.

Key concepts: Animal science, Biology, Body weight, Grading scale, Medicine, Endocrinology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A large-scale test of the effects of food restriction on the performance of fattening pigs — Research Paper | ScholarLens