2004•International Journal of Radiation BiologyRequires access

Time benefit in the assessment of recurrences following fractionated radiotherapy in an experimental tumour system using positron‐emission tomography with18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose

Maike de Wit, Annette Raabe, Barbara Seegers, Ralph Buchert, Hans‐Peter Beck‐Bornholdt, W. Alberti, D Hossfeld

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the diagnosis of R1H tumours after fractionated radiotherapy, and the dependency of sensitivity and specificity on time after therapy. In addition, the time benefit of FDG-PET concerning early recognition of recurrences after fractionated radiotherapy was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Subcutaneously growing rat rhabdomyosarcoma R1H tumours were irradiated by applying total doses of 80 or 85 Gy after reaching a start volume of 0.8 cm3. Twenty animals were treated. Tumour volume was determined twice a week. FDG-PET was performed weekly before, during and for 6 months after therapy using a conventional full-ring whole-body PET scanner. In total, 600 PET results were evaluated qualitatively using a six-scale score. PET results and actual tumour volumes were compared. The sensitivity and specificity of tumour detection by PET was calculated for different times after the onset of therapy. The optimal score for tumour detection and the influence of time after therapy on the quality of PET (time benefit) was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristics. RESULTS: After irradiation, 8/20 tumours (40%) were locally controlled, while 12/20 recurred. In this tumour model, evidence of relapse is assured when a volume of 0.1 cm3 is reached. Sensitivity of tumour diagnosis by PET increases with time, i.e. with the volume of recurrent tumours after the onset of therapy, mounting to > 0.95 after 100 days. Specificities of 0.95-1.0 were determined after therapy, showing no increase with time. Tumour diagnosis by PET is highly accurate when performed 80 days after the start of treatment. On average, tumours were recognized by PET on 31, 62, 74 and 81 days (median) before approaching volumes of 0.2, 0.5, 0.8 or 1.0 cm3, respectively. CONCLUSION: An experimental system was implemented that allows reproducible detection of recurrent R1H tumours after radiotherapy using FDG-PET. The usefulness of PET as a diagnostic test for R1H tumours is very good and a reliable resolution for PET is demonstrated for volumes < 1 cm3. The results indicate that FDG-PET enables early recognition of recurrences after fractionated radiotherapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the diagnosis of R1H tumours after fractionated radiotherapy, and the dependency of sensitivity and specificity on time after therapy. In addition, the time benefit of FDG-PET concerning early recognition of recurrences after fractionated radiotherapy was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Subcutaneously growing rat rhabdomyosarcoma R1H tumours were irradiated by applying total doses of 80 or 85 Gy after reaching a start volume of 0.8 cm3. Twenty animals were treated. Tumour volume was determined twice a week. FDG-PET was performed weekly before, during and for 6 months after therapy using a conventional full-ring whole-body PET scanner. In total, 600 PET results were evaluated qualitatively using a six-scale score. PET results and actual tumour volumes were compared. The sensitivity and specificity of tumour detection by PET was calculated for different times after the onset of therapy. The optimal score for tumour detection and the influence of time after therapy on the quality of PET (time benefit) was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristics. RESULTS: After irradiation, 8/20 tumours (40%) were locally controlled, while 12/20 recurred. In this tumour model, evidence of relapse is assured when a volume of 0.1 cm3 is reached. Sensitivity of tumour diagnosis by PET increases with time, i.e. with the volume of recurrent tumours after the onset of therapy, mounting to > 0.95 after 100 days. Specificities of 0.95-1.0 were determined after therapy, showing no increase with time. Tumour diagnosis by PET is highly accurate when performed 80 days after the start of treatment. On average, tumours were recognized by PET on 31, 62, 74 and 81 days (median) before approaching volumes of 0.2, 0.5, 0.8 or 1.0 cm3, respectively. CONCLUSION: An experimental system was implemented that allows reproducible detection of recurrent R1H tumours after radiotherapy using FDG-PET. The usefulness of PET as a diagnostic test for R1H tumours is very good and a reliable resolution for PET is demonstrated for volumes < 1 cm3. The results indicate that FDG-PET enables early recognition of recurrences after fractionated radiotherapy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the diagnosis of R1H tumours after fractionated radiotherapy, and the dependency of sensitivity and specificity on time after therapy. In addition, the time benefit of FDG-PET concerning early recognition of recurrences after fractionated radiotherapy was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Subcutaneously growing rat rhabdomyosarcoma R1H tumours were irradiated by applying total doses of 80 or 85 Gy after reaching a start volume of 0.8 cm3. Twenty animals were treated. Tumour volume was determined twice a week. FDG-PET was performed weekly before, during and for 6 months after therapy using a conventional full-ring whole-body PET scanner. In total, 600 PET results were evaluated qualitatively using a six-scale score. PET results and actual tumour volumes were compared. The sensitivity and specificity of tumour detection by PET was calculated for different times after the onset of therapy. The optimal score for tumour detection and the influence of time after therapy on the quality of PET (time benefit) was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristics. RESULTS: After irradiation, 8/20 tumours (40%) were locally controlled, while 12/20 recurred. In this tumour model, evidence of relapse is assured when a volume of 0.1 cm3 is reached. Sensitivity of tumour diagnosis by PET increases with time, i.e. with the volume of recurrent tumours after the onset of therapy, mounting to > 0.95 after 100 days. Specificities of 0.95-1.0 were determined after therapy, showing no increase with time. Tumour diagnosis by PET is highly accurate when performed 80 days after the start of treatment. On average, tumours were recognized by PET on 31, 62, 74 and 81 days (median) before approaching volumes of 0.2, 0.5, 0.8 or 1.0 cm3, respectively. CONCLUSION: An experimental system was implemented that allows reproducible detection of recurrent R1H tumours after radiotherapy using FDG-PET. The usefulness of PET as a diagnostic test for R1H tumours is very good and a reliable resolution for PET is demonstrated for volumes < 1 cm3. The results indicate that FDG-PET enables early recognition of recurrences after fractionated radiotherapy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Nuclear medicine, Positron emission tomography, Radiation therapy, Fluorodeoxyglucose, Positron emission, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Time benefit in the assessment of recurrences following fractionated radiotherapy in an experimental tumour system using positron‐emission tomography with18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose — Research Paper | ScholarLens