2009•Heart RhythmRequires access

Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Cryoablation with 6-mm-tip catheters is still less effective than radiofrequency ablation

Aaisha Opel, Sam Murray, Nikhil Kamath, Mehul Dhinoja, Dominic J. Abrams, Simon Sporton, Richard J. Schilling, Mark J. Earley

Open publisher page 61 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 61 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Cryoablation, Medicine, Ablation, Tachycardia, Atrioventricular block, Catheter ablation, Radiofrequency ablation, Fluoroscopy

Back to paper search Browse research topics Original source

Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Cryoablation with 6-mm-tip catheters is still less effective than radiofrequency ablation — Research Paper | ScholarLens