1995Journal of Hydraulic EngineeringRequires access

Alluvial Channel Geometry: Theory and Applications

Pierre Y. Juliën, Jayamurni Wargadalam

Open publisher page 153 citations

Abstract

The downstream hydraulic geometry of alluvial channels, in terms of bank-full width, average flow depth, mean flow velocity, and friction slope, is examined from a three-dimensional stability analysis of noncohesive particles under two-dimensional flows. Four governing equations (flow rate, resistance to flow, secondary flow, and particle mobility) are solved to analytically define the downstream hydraulic geometry of noncohesive alluvial channels as a function of water discharge, sediment size, Shields number, and streamline deviation angle. The exponents of hydraulic geometry relationships change with relative submergence. Four exponent diagrams illustrate the good agreement with several empirical regime equations found in the literature. The analytical formulations were tested with a comprehensive data set consisting of 835 field channels and 45 laboratory channels. The data set covers a wide range of flow conditions from meandering to braided, sand-bed and gravel-bed rivers with flow depths and channel widths varying by four orders of magnitude. Figures illustrate the results of the three-part analysis consisting of calibration, verification, and validation of the proposed hydraulic geometry equations. Field and laboratory observations are in very good agreement with the calculations of flow depth, channel width, mean flow velocity, and friction slope.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The downstream hydraulic geometry of alluvial channels, in terms of bank-full width, average flow depth, mean flow velocity, and friction slope, is examined from a three-dimensional stability analysis of noncohesive particles under two-dimensional flows. Four governing equations (flow rate, resistance to flow, secondary flow, and particle mobility) are solved to analytically define the downstream hydraulic geometry of noncohesive alluvial channels as a function of water discharge, sediment size, Shields number, and streamline deviation angle. The exponents of hydraulic geometry relationships change with relative submergence. Four exponent diagrams illustrate the good agreement with several empirical regime equations found in the literature. The analytical formulations were tested with a comprehensive data set consisting of 835 field channels and 45 laboratory channels. The data set covers a wide range of flow conditions from meandering to braided, sand-bed and gravel-bed rivers with flow depths and channel widths varying by four orders of magnitude. Figures illustrate the results of the three-part analysis consisting of calibration, verification, and validation of the proposed hydraulic geometry equations. Field and laboratory observations are in very good agreement with the calculations of flow depth, channel width, mean flow velocity, and friction slope.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 153 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The downstream hydraulic geometry of alluvial channels, in terms of bank-full width, average flow depth, mean flow velocity, and friction slope, is examined from a three-dimensional stability analysis of noncohesive particles under two-dimensional flows. Four governing equations (flow rate, resistance to flow, secondary flow, and particle mobility) are solved to analytically define the downstream hydraulic geometry of noncohesive alluvial channels as a function of water discharge, sediment size, Shields number, and streamline deviation angle. The exponents of hydraulic geometry relationships change with relative submergence. Four exponent diagrams illustrate the good agreement with several empirical regime equations found in the literature. The analytical formulations were tested with a comprehensive data set consisting of 835 field channels and 45 laboratory channels. The data set covers a wide range of flow conditions from meandering to braided, sand-bed and gravel-bed rivers with flow depths and channel widths varying by four orders of magnitude. Figures illustrate the results of the three-part analysis consisting of calibration, verification, and validation of the proposed hydraulic geometry equations. Field and laboratory observations are in very good agreement with the calculations of flow depth, channel width, mean flow velocity, and friction slope.

Key concepts: Geometry, Geology, Open-channel flow, Flow (mathematics), Geotechnical engineering, Hydraulics, Sediment transport, Alluvium

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Alluvial Channel Geometry: Theory and Applications — Research Paper | ScholarLens