Salvage surgery after failed primary concomitant chemoradiation
Steve C. Lee, Carol G. Shores, Mark Christian Weissler
Abstract
Steve C. Lee, Carol G. Shores, Mark Christian Weissler
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Primary treatment of many head and neck cancers is shifting to nonsurgical modalities with concomitant chemoradiation becoming increasing prevalent. With this change, surgery is moving to a role as a salvage treatment modality. As a result of this shift, it is important to understand the issues surrounding surgical salvage after chemoradiation. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies have consistently found that salvage surgery after chemoradiation carries a high complication rate, higher than either primary surgery or salvage surgery after radiation alone. There are very few reports on the success rate of salvage surgery after failed primary concurrent chemoradiation, but what little data we have seems to suggest success rates approximate success rates for salvage after radiation therapy. There are also reasons to believe that efficacy of salvage surgery varies by stage and site of disease. Also, fundamental differences in the nature of cancer after failed primary therapy have been elucidated by recent studies. SUMMARY: While salvage surgery is fraught with higher morbidity and lower efficacy than primary surgery, it remains the only potentially curative option available to patients who have failed 'organ preservation' primary therapy. We review issues to consider when managing these challenging patients.
OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Primary treatment of many head and neck cancers is shifting to nonsurgical modalities with concomitant chemoradiation becoming increasing prevalent. With this change, surgery is moving to a role as a salvage treatment modality. As a result of this shift, it is important to understand the issues surrounding surgical salvage after chemoradiation. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies have consistently found that salvage surgery after chemoradiation carries a high complication rate, higher than either primary surgery or salvage surgery after radiation alone. There are very few reports on the success rate of salvage surgery after failed primary concurrent chemoradiation, but what little data we have seems to suggest success rates approximate success rates for salvage after radiation therapy. There are also reasons to believe that efficacy of salvage surgery varies by stage and site of disease. Also, fundamental differences in the nature of cancer after failed primary therapy have been elucidated by recent studies. SUMMARY: While salvage surgery is fraught with higher morbidity and lower efficacy than primary surgery, it remains the only potentially curative option available to patients who have failed 'organ preservation' primary therapy. We review issues to consider when managing these challenging patients.
Key concepts: Medicine, Salvage surgery, Salvage therapy, Concomitant, Surgery, Radiation therapy, Modalities, Primary treatment