2003•Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part ARequires access

Microhardness of superficial and deep sound human dentin

Victoria Fuentes, Manuel Toledano, Raquel Osorio, Ricardo M. Carvalho

Open publisher page 129 citations

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to determine the microhardness of superficial and deep dentin by means of two indentation methods (Knoop and Vickers) under two different applied loads. Twelve dentin discs approximately 2-mm thick were obtained from both superficial and deep dentin by transversally sectioning the crowns of sound, extracted human third molars with a diamond blade under water irrigation. Dentin surfaces were sequentially polished, and indentations (n = 20 per surface) were performed with either Vickers indentor at loads of 300 and 500 g, respectively, or Knoop indentor at loads of 50 and 100 g, respectively. Average Vickers hardness number (VHN) and Knoop hardness number (KHN) were calculated and treated with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test. Microhardness of dentin was not influenced by the different loads applied for both indentation methods. Knoop hardness was significantly higher for superficial than for deep dentin (p < 0.05). Conversely, Vickers hardness was not significantly different for both substrates (p > 0.05). Differences in dentin hardness as a function of depth exist, but they might not be relevant, and no alteration of the distribution of stresses along the adhesive interface is expected.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Our purpose in this study was to determine the microhardness of superficial and deep dentin by means of two indentation methods (Knoop and Vickers) under two different applied loads. Twelve dentin discs approximately 2-mm thick were obtained from both superficial and deep dentin by transversally sectioning the crowns of sound, extracted human third molars with a diamond blade under water irrigation. Dentin surfaces were sequentially polished, and indentations (n = 20 per surface) were performed with either Vickers indentor at loads of 300 and 500 g, respectively, or Knoop indentor at loads of 50 and 100 g, respectively. Average Vickers hardness number (VHN) and Knoop hardness number (KHN) were calculated and treated with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test. Microhardness of dentin was not influenced by the different loads applied for both indentation methods. Knoop hardness was significantly higher for superficial than for deep dentin (p < 0.05). Conversely, Vickers hardness was not significantly different for both substrates (p > 0.05). Differences in dentin hardness as a function of depth exist, but they might not be relevant, and no alteration of the distribution of stresses along the adhesive interface is expected.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 129 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Our purpose in this study was to determine the microhardness of superficial and deep dentin by means of two indentation methods (Knoop and Vickers) under two different applied loads. Twelve dentin discs approximately 2-mm thick were obtained from both superficial and deep dentin by transversally sectioning the crowns of sound, extracted human third molars with a diamond blade under water irrigation. Dentin surfaces were sequentially polished, and indentations (n = 20 per surface) were performed with either Vickers indentor at loads of 300 and 500 g, respectively, or Knoop indentor at loads of 50 and 100 g, respectively. Average Vickers hardness number (VHN) and Knoop hardness number (KHN) were calculated and treated with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test. Microhardness of dentin was not influenced by the different loads applied for both indentation methods. Knoop hardness was significantly higher for superficial than for deep dentin (p < 0.05). Conversely, Vickers hardness was not significantly different for both substrates (p > 0.05). Differences in dentin hardness as a function of depth exist, but they might not be relevant, and no alteration of the distribution of stresses along the adhesive interface is expected.

Key concepts: Knoop hardness test, Materials science, Dentin, Indentation hardness, Indentation, Vickers hardness test, Composite material, Molar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Microhardness of superficial and deep sound human dentin — Research Paper | ScholarLens