1964•Grass and Forage ScienceRequires access

THE USE OF GRAZING CONTROL FOR INTENSIVE FAT‐LAMB PRODUCTION

Peter J. Broadbent

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Three grazing managements (set stocking, 4‐paddock rotation, 8‐paddock rotation), each with an undivided lateral creep area, were studied. Each of these managements carried 2 stocking rates (6 ewes and twin lambs per acre, 10 ewes and twin iambs per acre) and the sub‐divided managements were grazed at 2 severities of grazing. Stocking rate had a major effect upon the lambs' liveweights but did not significantly affect the ewes’ liveweights. Lambs on set‐stocking managements had a significantly higher rate of liveweiglit gain than lambs on managements with sub‐divided ewe areas. Under lax grazing, for much of the experimental period, the lambs had a significantly higher rate of liveweight gain and the ewes had significantly higher liveweights than under severe grazing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three grazing managements (set stocking, 4‐paddock rotation, 8‐paddock rotation), each with an undivided lateral creep area, were studied. Each of these managements carried 2 stocking rates (6 ewes and twin lambs per acre, 10 ewes and twin iambs per acre) and the sub‐divided managements were grazed at 2 severities of grazing. Stocking rate had a major effect upon the lambs' liveweights but did not significantly affect the ewes’ liveweights. Lambs on set‐stocking managements had a significantly higher rate of liveweiglit gain than lambs on managements with sub‐divided ewe areas. Under lax grazing, for much of the experimental period, the lambs had a significantly higher rate of liveweight gain and the ewes had significantly higher liveweights than under severe grazing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three grazing managements (set stocking, 4‐paddock rotation, 8‐paddock rotation), each with an undivided lateral creep area, were studied. Each of these managements carried 2 stocking rates (6 ewes and twin lambs per acre, 10 ewes and twin iambs per acre) and the sub‐divided managements were grazed at 2 severities of grazing. Stocking rate had a major effect upon the lambs' liveweights but did not significantly affect the ewes’ liveweights. Lambs on set‐stocking managements had a significantly higher rate of liveweiglit gain than lambs on managements with sub‐divided ewe areas. Under lax grazing, for much of the experimental period, the lambs had a significantly higher rate of liveweight gain and the ewes had significantly higher liveweights than under severe grazing.

Key concepts: Grazing, Stocking, Acre, Stocking rate, Agronomy, Biology, Animal science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE USE OF GRAZING CONTROL FOR INTENSIVE FAT‐LAMB PRODUCTION — Research Paper | ScholarLens