1965•Journal of the Science of Food and AgricultureRequires access

Further studies on the limiting amino‐acids differently processed groundnut meals

Hans Fisher

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Different samples of groundnut meal were fed to growing chicks and supplemented factorially with the three amino‐acids lysine, methionine and threonine. There were appreciable differences among the samples in terms of their growth‐promoting properties and the order of amino‐acid limitation. In a comparison of differently processed groundnuts from the same fresh supply, it was found that a solvent‐extracted preparation was equally limiting in all three amino‐acids and responded only to the triple‐supplementation. An expeller pressed meal, as well as an expeller and solvent‐extracted preparation was first limiting in lysine but responded differently to other combinations of the three amino‐acids. Amino‐acid analysis of the different groundnut samples indicated differences, particularly a lower sulphur‐containing amino‐acid content for solvent‐extracted meals. All of the groundnut meals tested had a lower lysine content than those reported in the literature.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Different samples of groundnut meal were fed to growing chicks and supplemented factorially with the three amino‐acids lysine, methionine and threonine. There were appreciable differences among the samples in terms of their growth‐promoting properties and the order of amino‐acid limitation. In a comparison of differently processed groundnuts from the same fresh supply, it was found that a solvent‐extracted preparation was equally limiting in all three amino‐acids and responded only to the triple‐supplementation. An expeller pressed meal, as well as an expeller and solvent‐extracted preparation was first limiting in lysine but responded differently to other combinations of the three amino‐acids. Amino‐acid analysis of the different groundnut samples indicated differences, particularly a lower sulphur‐containing amino‐acid content for solvent‐extracted meals. All of the groundnut meals tested had a lower lysine content than those reported in the literature.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Different samples of groundnut meal were fed to growing chicks and supplemented factorially with the three amino‐acids lysine, methionine and threonine. There were appreciable differences among the samples in terms of their growth‐promoting properties and the order of amino‐acid limitation. In a comparison of differently processed groundnuts from the same fresh supply, it was found that a solvent‐extracted preparation was equally limiting in all three amino‐acids and responded only to the triple‐supplementation. An expeller pressed meal, as well as an expeller and solvent‐extracted preparation was first limiting in lysine but responded differently to other combinations of the three amino‐acids. Amino‐acid analysis of the different groundnut samples indicated differences, particularly a lower sulphur‐containing amino‐acid content for solvent‐extracted meals. All of the groundnut meals tested had a lower lysine content than those reported in the literature.

Key concepts: Methionine, Limiting, Lysine, Amino acid, Food science, Threonine, Chemistry, Meal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Further studies on the limiting amino‐acids differently processed groundnut meals — Research Paper | ScholarLens