1988Journal of Parenteral and Enteral NutritionRequires access

Clinical evaluation of two‐liter prepacked enteral diet delivery system: a controlled trial

R.G. Rees, Jessica Ryan, H. Attrill, DB Silk

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

Following a recent study in our Unit which showed that significantly more of prescribed enteral diet was administered from 2-liter bags than 0.51 bottles, a controlled clinical trial was undertaken to investigate further the effectiveness of the 2-liter prepackaged enteral delivery system. Forty patients with normal gastrointestinal function requiring enteral nutrition were randomized to receive nasogastrically 2-liter/day of polymeric diet (2000 kcal, 12 g N) either from a presterilized 2-liter PVC bag (Express EFI Ltd, UK) or from two 1-liter rigid plastic containers filled with cans of Clinifeed 400 (Roussel Laboratories Ltd, UK). The actual volumes of feed infused were monitored in patients fed for 5 days or more. Both nursing and dietetic staff preferred the 2-liter bags which were more convenient to prepare and use. Significantly larger quantities of prescribed diet were delivered from the 2-liter bags than from the 1-liter containers (p less than 0.001). It was concluded that the 2-liter bag system was potentially more convenient and nutritionally efficacious than 1-liter containers. Although the incidence of microbial contamination associated with the 2-liter bags was low, measures to maintain the sterility of this system may need to be more stringent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Following a recent study in our Unit which showed that significantly more of prescribed enteral diet was administered from 2-liter bags than 0.51 bottles, a controlled clinical trial was undertaken to investigate further the effectiveness of the 2-liter prepackaged enteral delivery system. Forty patients with normal gastrointestinal function requiring enteral nutrition were randomized to receive nasogastrically 2-liter/day of polymeric diet (2000 kcal, 12 g N) either from a presterilized 2-liter PVC bag (Express EFI Ltd, UK) or from two 1-liter rigid plastic containers filled with cans of Clinifeed 400 (Roussel Laboratories Ltd, UK). The actual volumes of feed infused were monitored in patients fed for 5 days or more. Both nursing and dietetic staff preferred the 2-liter bags which were more convenient to prepare and use. Significantly larger quantities of prescribed diet were delivered from the 2-liter bags than from the 1-liter containers (p less than 0.001). It was concluded that the 2-liter bag system was potentially more convenient and nutritionally efficacious than 1-liter containers. Although the incidence of microbial contamination associated with the 2-liter bags was low, measures to maintain the sterility of this system may need to be more stringent.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Following a recent study in our Unit which showed that significantly more of prescribed enteral diet was administered from 2-liter bags than 0.51 bottles, a controlled clinical trial was undertaken to investigate further the effectiveness of the 2-liter prepackaged enteral delivery system. Forty patients with normal gastrointestinal function requiring enteral nutrition were randomized to receive nasogastrically 2-liter/day of polymeric diet (2000 kcal, 12 g N) either from a presterilized 2-liter PVC bag (Express EFI Ltd, UK) or from two 1-liter rigid plastic containers filled with cans of Clinifeed 400 (Roussel Laboratories Ltd, UK). The actual volumes of feed infused were monitored in patients fed for 5 days or more. Both nursing and dietetic staff preferred the 2-liter bags which were more convenient to prepare and use. Significantly larger quantities of prescribed diet were delivered from the 2-liter bags than from the 1-liter containers (p less than 0.001). It was concluded that the 2-liter bag system was potentially more convenient and nutritionally efficacious than 1-liter containers. Although the incidence of microbial contamination associated with the 2-liter bags was low, measures to maintain the sterility of this system may need to be more stringent.

Key concepts: Liter, Medicine, Enteral administration, Parenteral nutrition, Surgery, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical evaluation of two‐liter prepacked enteral diet delivery system: a controlled trial — Research Paper | ScholarLens