1992Journal of Food ScienceRequires access

Consumer Acceptance of Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) as an Alternative Species to Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri)

R.ICHARD C. ROUNDS, Charley Glenn, A. O. Bush

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rainbow trout and brown trout were prepared and distributed to consumers for comparative taste tests to determine consumer reaction to brown trout. In‐home tests were standardized with paired samples of fish. Color of flesh, odor, flavor, texture and overall acceptability were recorded on a 9‐point Hedonic scale. Sensory results indicated that brown trout raised in farm stock ponds were more acceptable than rainbow trout from similar environments, and rainbow trout from natural winter‐kill lakes were more acceptable than brown trout from the same or similar lakes. Overall, we conclude that brown trout would be acceptable to consumers. Variations in acceptability related to water body of origin rather than to species of fish. Significant differences occurred in some characteristics but were inconsistent as to species.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Rainbow trout and brown trout were prepared and distributed to consumers for comparative taste tests to determine consumer reaction to brown trout. In‐home tests were standardized with paired samples of fish. Color of flesh, odor, flavor, texture and overall acceptability were recorded on a 9‐point Hedonic scale. Sensory results indicated that brown trout raised in farm stock ponds were more acceptable than rainbow trout from similar environments, and rainbow trout from natural winter‐kill lakes were more acceptable than brown trout from the same or similar lakes. Overall, we conclude that brown trout would be acceptable to consumers. Variations in acceptability related to water body of origin rather than to species of fish. Significant differences occurred in some characteristics but were inconsistent as to species.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Rainbow trout and brown trout were prepared and distributed to consumers for comparative taste tests to determine consumer reaction to brown trout. In‐home tests were standardized with paired samples of fish. Color of flesh, odor, flavor, texture and overall acceptability were recorded on a 9‐point Hedonic scale. Sensory results indicated that brown trout raised in farm stock ponds were more acceptable than rainbow trout from similar environments, and rainbow trout from natural winter‐kill lakes were more acceptable than brown trout from the same or similar lakes. Overall, we conclude that brown trout would be acceptable to consumers. Variations in acceptability related to water body of origin rather than to species of fish. Significant differences occurred in some characteristics but were inconsistent as to species.

Key concepts: Salmo, Brown trout, Rainbow trout, Trout, Fishery, Flesh, Biology, Fish <Actinopterygii>

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Consumer Acceptance of Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) as an Alternative Species to Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri) — Research Paper | ScholarLens