1976Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyOpen access

Activity of Newer Aminoglycosides and Carbenicillin, Alone and in Combination, Against Gentamicin-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Melvin I. Marks, S. Hammerberg, Gerrard Greenstone, Barry Silver

Open full text 41 citations

Abstract

The in vitro activity of the aminoglycoside antibiotics tobramycin, sisomicin, amikacin, gentamicin, and netilmicin (SCH 20569) were compared against 26 gentamicin-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultured from hospitalized children. Tobramycin had the greatest activity on a weight basis, followed by sisomicin, gentamicin, amikacin, and netilmicin. All isolates were resistant to achievable concentrations of netilmicin and gentamicin, but 23% were inhibited by achievable concentrations of tobramycin, 8% by amikacin, and 4% by sisomicin. The combinations carbenicillin/tobramycin, carbenicillin/sisomicin, and carbenicillin/amikacin were synergistic for 92% of strains; antagonism was not encountered. These in vitro results suggest that tobramycin, sisomicin, or amikacin in combination with carbenicillin would be the safest initial regimen in the therapy of gentamicin-resistant Pseudomonas infections pending susceptibility studies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The in vitro activity of the aminoglycoside antibiotics tobramycin, sisomicin, amikacin, gentamicin, and netilmicin (SCH 20569) were compared against 26 gentamicin-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultured from hospitalized children. Tobramycin had the greatest activity on a weight basis, followed by sisomicin, gentamicin, amikacin, and netilmicin. All isolates were resistant to achievable concentrations of netilmicin and gentamicin, but 23% were inhibited by achievable concentrations of tobramycin, 8% by amikacin, and 4% by sisomicin. The combinations carbenicillin/tobramycin, carbenicillin/sisomicin, and carbenicillin/amikacin were synergistic for 92% of strains; antagonism was not encountered. These in vitro results suggest that tobramycin, sisomicin, or amikacin in combination with carbenicillin would be the safest initial regimen in the therapy of gentamicin-resistant Pseudomonas infections pending susceptibility studies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 41 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The in vitro activity of the aminoglycoside antibiotics tobramycin, sisomicin, amikacin, gentamicin, and netilmicin (SCH 20569) were compared against 26 gentamicin-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultured from hospitalized children. Tobramycin had the greatest activity on a weight basis, followed by sisomicin, gentamicin, amikacin, and netilmicin. All isolates were resistant to achievable concentrations of netilmicin and gentamicin, but 23% were inhibited by achievable concentrations of tobramycin, 8% by amikacin, and 4% by sisomicin. The combinations carbenicillin/tobramycin, carbenicillin/sisomicin, and carbenicillin/amikacin were synergistic for 92% of strains; antagonism was not encountered. These in vitro results suggest that tobramycin, sisomicin, or amikacin in combination with carbenicillin would be the safest initial regimen in the therapy of gentamicin-resistant Pseudomonas infections pending susceptibility studies.

Key concepts: Sisomicin, Tobramycin, Netilmicin, Carbenicillin, Amikacin, Gentamicin, Aminoglycoside, Microbiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Activity of Newer Aminoglycosides and Carbenicillin, Alone and in Combination, Against Gentamicin-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa — Research Paper | ScholarLens