1999NeurologyRequires access

Transcranial magnetic stimulation identifies upper motor neuron involvement in motor neuron disease

William J. Triggs, Daniel L. Menkes, Janice Onorato, Ru-Jia Yan, Michael Young, Kelly A. Newell, Howard W. Sander, Oscar Soto, Keith H. Chiappa, David Cros

Open publisher page 132 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to identify upper motor neuron involvement in patients with motor neuron disease. BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of ALS depends on upper and lower motor neuron involvement. Lower motor neuron involvement may be documented with electromyography, whereas definite evidence of upper motor neuron involvement may be elusive. A sensitive, noninvasive test of upper motor neuron function would be useful. METHODS: TMS and clinical assessment in 121 patients with motor neuron disease. RESULTS: TMS revealed evidence of upper motor neuron dysfunction in 84 of 121 (69%) patients, including 30 of 40 (75%) patients with only probable upper motor neuron signs and unsuspected upper motor neuron involvement in 6 of 22 (27%) patients who had purely lower motor neuron syndromes clinically. In selected cases, upper motor neuron involvement identified with TMS was verified in postmortem examination. Increased motor evoked potential threshold was the abnormality observed most frequently and was only weakly related to peripheral compound muscle action potential amplitude. In a subset of 12 patients reexamined after 11+/-6 months, TMS showed progression of abnormalities, including progressive inexcitability of central motor pathways and loss of the normal inhibitory cortical stimulation silent period. CONCLUSIONS: TMS provides a sensitive means for the assessment and monitoring of excitatory and inhibitory upper motor neuron function in motor neuron disease.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to identify upper motor neuron involvement in patients with motor neuron disease. BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of ALS depends on upper and lower motor neuron involvement. Lower motor neuron involvement may be documented with electromyography, whereas definite evidence of upper motor neuron involvement may be elusive. A sensitive, noninvasive test of upper motor neuron function would be useful. METHODS: TMS and clinical assessment in 121 patients with motor neuron disease. RESULTS: TMS revealed evidence of upper motor neuron dysfunction in 84 of 121 (69%) patients, including 30 of 40 (75%) patients with only probable upper motor neuron signs and unsuspected upper motor neuron involvement in 6 of 22 (27%) patients who had purely lower motor neuron syndromes clinically. In selected cases, upper motor neuron involvement identified with TMS was verified in postmortem examination. Increased motor evoked potential threshold was the abnormality observed most frequently and was only weakly related to peripheral compound muscle action potential amplitude. In a subset of 12 patients reexamined after 11+/-6 months, TMS showed progression of abnormalities, including progressive inexcitability of central motor pathways and loss of the normal inhibitory cortical stimulation silent period. CONCLUSIONS: TMS provides a sensitive means for the assessment and monitoring of excitatory and inhibitory upper motor neuron function in motor neuron disease.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 132 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to identify upper motor neuron involvement in patients with motor neuron disease. BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of ALS depends on upper and lower motor neuron involvement. Lower motor neuron involvement may be documented with electromyography, whereas definite evidence of upper motor neuron involvement may be elusive. A sensitive, noninvasive test of upper motor neuron function would be useful. METHODS: TMS and clinical assessment in 121 patients with motor neuron disease. RESULTS: TMS revealed evidence of upper motor neuron dysfunction in 84 of 121 (69%) patients, including 30 of 40 (75%) patients with only probable upper motor neuron signs and unsuspected upper motor neuron involvement in 6 of 22 (27%) patients who had purely lower motor neuron syndromes clinically. In selected cases, upper motor neuron involvement identified with TMS was verified in postmortem examination. Increased motor evoked potential threshold was the abnormality observed most frequently and was only weakly related to peripheral compound muscle action potential amplitude. In a subset of 12 patients reexamined after 11+/-6 months, TMS showed progression of abnormalities, including progressive inexcitability of central motor pathways and loss of the normal inhibitory cortical stimulation silent period. CONCLUSIONS: TMS provides a sensitive means for the assessment and monitoring of excitatory and inhibitory upper motor neuron function in motor neuron disease.

Key concepts: Motor neuron, Upper motor neuron, Lower motor neuron, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Neuron, Neuroscience, Inhibitory postsynaptic potential, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transcranial magnetic stimulation identifies upper motor neuron involvement in motor neuron disease — Research Paper | ScholarLens