1991Liver InternationalRequires access

Expression of hepatitis B surface antigen subtypes in liver of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma; comparison of subtypes in serum and liver

Yoshiyuki Nakatsuji, Kendo Kiyosawa, Eiji Tanaka, Takeshi Sodeyama, Naoto Horigome, Shoji Kajikawa, Shigeko Naito, Yoshihiro Akahane

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

To clarify the discrepancy in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) subtypes present in the serum and liver, as well as among hepatocytes, liver specimens which were resected from 37 HBsAg-positive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were examined. We evaluated HBsAg and the subtypic determinants of HBsAg and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) staining method. Hepatitis B antigens were more frequently detected in small tumors (HBsAg in 67%. HBcAg in 40%) than in large ones (HBsAg in 36%, HBcAg in 14%). The prevalence of each subtypic determinant in the HBsAg positive non-tumorous vs. tumorous areas was 100% vs. 67% in a, 100% vs. 57% in d, 100% vs. not tested in y, 100% vs. 53% in r and 25% vs. 0% in w (a, d, y, r and w represent subtypic determinants). There was virtually no difference in a set of subtypic determinants between the serum and liver. However, there were some variations in a set of subtypic determinants among the hepatocytes. On the other hand, liver tissue of compound subtype adyr in serum contained both cells with a,d,r and with a,y,r as well as a few cells with a,d,y,r. These findings suggest that HBV genomes in hepatocytes of type B chronic liver disease may differ genetically among cells even in the same liver tissue.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To clarify the discrepancy in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) subtypes present in the serum and liver, as well as among hepatocytes, liver specimens which were resected from 37 HBsAg-positive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were examined. We evaluated HBsAg and the subtypic determinants of HBsAg and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) staining method. Hepatitis B antigens were more frequently detected in small tumors (HBsAg in 67%. HBcAg in 40%) than in large ones (HBsAg in 36%, HBcAg in 14%). The prevalence of each subtypic determinant in the HBsAg positive non-tumorous vs. tumorous areas was 100% vs. 67% in a, 100% vs. 57% in d, 100% vs. not tested in y, 100% vs. 53% in r and 25% vs. 0% in w (a, d, y, r and w represent subtypic determinants). There was virtually no difference in a set of subtypic determinants between the serum and liver. However, there were some variations in a set of subtypic determinants among the hepatocytes. On the other hand, liver tissue of compound subtype adyr in serum contained both cells with a,d,r and with a,y,r as well as a few cells with a,d,y,r. These findings suggest that HBV genomes in hepatocytes of type B chronic liver disease may differ genetically among cells even in the same liver tissue.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To clarify the discrepancy in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) subtypes present in the serum and liver, as well as among hepatocytes, liver specimens which were resected from 37 HBsAg-positive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were examined. We evaluated HBsAg and the subtypic determinants of HBsAg and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) staining method. Hepatitis B antigens were more frequently detected in small tumors (HBsAg in 67%. HBcAg in 40%) than in large ones (HBsAg in 36%, HBcAg in 14%). The prevalence of each subtypic determinant in the HBsAg positive non-tumorous vs. tumorous areas was 100% vs. 67% in a, 100% vs. 57% in d, 100% vs. not tested in y, 100% vs. 53% in r and 25% vs. 0% in w (a, d, y, r and w represent subtypic determinants). There was virtually no difference in a set of subtypic determinants between the serum and liver. However, there were some variations in a set of subtypic determinants among the hepatocytes. On the other hand, liver tissue of compound subtype adyr in serum contained both cells with a,d,r and with a,y,r as well as a few cells with a,d,y,r. These findings suggest that HBV genomes in hepatocytes of type B chronic liver disease may differ genetically among cells even in the same liver tissue.

Key concepts: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Medicine, Antigen, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis, Pathology, Carcinoma, Immunology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Expression of hepatitis B surface antigen subtypes in liver of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma; comparison of subtypes in serum and liver — Research Paper | ScholarLens