1998Unpublished venueRequires access

A Comparison of Prestack Reservoir Attributes Using Different 3D Prestack Migration Methods

J. Young, Jerome R. Krebs, C. J. Finn

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Even when subsurface velocities vary only moderately, accurate imaging of reservoir attributes in depth remains a challenge. Two crucial components of the solution are the determination of an accurate velocity model and the use of an appropriate imaging algorithm. We examine the depth accuracy and qualitative AVO response of images generated using different velocity models and different imaging methods. We conclude that velocities determined from offset checkshot data in conjunction with a 3-D Kirchhoff imaging algorithm yield prestack images whose depths and amplitudes are in better agreement with well data than 3-D prestack migration implemented as a multi-step process (MZO cascaded with zero offset migration).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Even when subsurface velocities vary only moderately, accurate imaging of reservoir attributes in depth remains a challenge. Two crucial components of the solution are the determination of an accurate velocity model and the use of an appropriate imaging algorithm. We examine the depth accuracy and qualitative AVO response of images generated using different velocity models and different imaging methods. We conclude that velocities determined from offset checkshot data in conjunction with a 3-D Kirchhoff imaging algorithm yield prestack images whose depths and amplitudes are in better agreement with well data than 3-D prestack migration implemented as a multi-step process (MZO cascaded with zero offset migration).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Even when subsurface velocities vary only moderately, accurate imaging of reservoir attributes in depth remains a challenge. Two crucial components of the solution are the determination of an accurate velocity model and the use of an appropriate imaging algorithm. We examine the depth accuracy and qualitative AVO response of images generated using different velocity models and different imaging methods. We conclude that velocities determined from offset checkshot data in conjunction with a 3-D Kirchhoff imaging algorithm yield prestack images whose depths and amplitudes are in better agreement with well data than 3-D prestack migration implemented as a multi-step process (MZO cascaded with zero offset migration).

Key concepts: Prestack, Offset (computer science), Geology, Amplitude, Amplitude versus offset, Algorithm, Yield (engineering), Seismology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Prestack Reservoir Attributes Using Different 3D Prestack Migration Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens