2012World Journal of SurgeryRequires access

Toward an Improved Understanding of Isolated Upright Reflux: Positional Effects on the Lower Esophageal Sphincter in Patients with Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux

Toshitaka Hoppo, Yoshihiro Komatsu, Alejandro Nieponice, Joan Schrenker, Blair A. Jobe

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of body position on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) structure and function. METHODS: Symptomatic patients underwent high-resolution manometry in the supine and upright positions followed by pH testing. Regardless of whether there was a positive DeMeester score, isolated upright reflux patterns were considered present when the supine fraction of time pH <4 = 0%. Predominant-upright and predominant-supine bipositional reflux (SBR) patterns were considered present when the supine fraction of time was upright fraction of time pH <4, respectively. RESULTS: Of 128 patients, 35 isolated upright, 55 predominant-upright bipositional, and 27 SBR patients were identified. When supine, LES pressure/length was higher in upright compared to bipositional reflux patients. When upright, there was no difference in LES pressure/length between groups. The LES in isolated upright reflux patients became defective when moved from supine to upright position compared to bipositional patients, where the LES was defective regardless of position. Although the incidence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) events was comparable between groups, isolated upright patients commonly had a normal DeMeester score. CONCLUSION: Position impacts LES competency in those with upright reflux and would not be detected with supine manometry. Upright reflux can be associated with GERD and LPR despite negative pH testing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of body position on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) structure and function. METHODS: Symptomatic patients underwent high-resolution manometry in the supine and upright positions followed by pH testing. Regardless of whether there was a positive DeMeester score, isolated upright reflux patterns were considered present when the supine fraction of time pH <4 = 0%. Predominant-upright and predominant-supine bipositional reflux (SBR) patterns were considered present when the supine fraction of time was upright fraction of time pH <4, respectively. RESULTS: Of 128 patients, 35 isolated upright, 55 predominant-upright bipositional, and 27 SBR patients were identified. When supine, LES pressure/length was higher in upright compared to bipositional reflux patients. When upright, there was no difference in LES pressure/length between groups. The LES in isolated upright reflux patients became defective when moved from supine to upright position compared to bipositional patients, where the LES was defective regardless of position. Although the incidence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) events was comparable between groups, isolated upright patients commonly had a normal DeMeester score. CONCLUSION: Position impacts LES competency in those with upright reflux and would not be detected with supine manometry. Upright reflux can be associated with GERD and LPR despite negative pH testing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of body position on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) structure and function. METHODS: Symptomatic patients underwent high-resolution manometry in the supine and upright positions followed by pH testing. Regardless of whether there was a positive DeMeester score, isolated upright reflux patterns were considered present when the supine fraction of time pH <4 = 0%. Predominant-upright and predominant-supine bipositional reflux (SBR) patterns were considered present when the supine fraction of time was upright fraction of time pH <4, respectively. RESULTS: Of 128 patients, 35 isolated upright, 55 predominant-upright bipositional, and 27 SBR patients were identified. When supine, LES pressure/length was higher in upright compared to bipositional reflux patients. When upright, there was no difference in LES pressure/length between groups. The LES in isolated upright reflux patients became defective when moved from supine to upright position compared to bipositional patients, where the LES was defective regardless of position. Although the incidence of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) events was comparable between groups, isolated upright patients commonly had a normal DeMeester score. CONCLUSION: Position impacts LES competency in those with upright reflux and would not be detected with supine manometry. Upright reflux can be associated with GERD and LPR despite negative pH testing.

Key concepts: Supine position, Reflux, Medicine, Esophageal sphincter, Esophageal pH monitoring, GERD, Body position, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Toward an Improved Understanding of Isolated Upright Reflux: Positional Effects on the Lower Esophageal Sphincter in Patients with Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux — Research Paper | ScholarLens