1980•The Review of Black Political EconomyRequires access

Federal Health Care Policy and the Public-General Hospital

Charles E. Anderson, Ronald D. Hester

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Although a stringent policy environment adversely affects both private and public hospitals, the market circumstances are worse for public hospitals. Because they are providers of last resort, they do not have as much flexibility as private hospitals in determining the quantity and scope of services they provide.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although a stringent policy environment adversely affects both private and public hospitals, the market circumstances are worse for public hospitals. Because they are providers of last resort, they do not have as much flexibility as private hospitals in determining the quantity and scope of services they provide.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although a stringent policy environment adversely affects both private and public hospitals, the market circumstances are worse for public hospitals. Because they are providers of last resort, they do not have as much flexibility as private hospitals in determining the quantity and scope of services they provide.

Key concepts: Political science, Public administration, Public policy, Health care, Economic growth, Economics, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Federal Health Care Policy and the Public-General Hospital — Research Paper | ScholarLens