1989British Journal of UrologyRequires access

Are Urodynamics Necessary in Female Patients Presenting with Stress Incontinence?

K. J. HASTIE, C. U. MOISEY

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

A urological and urodynamic database was used in a prospective study of female patients whose initial symptom was stress incontinence alone. The urodynamic diagnoses in 89 such patients were analysed against any additional symptoms. Fifty-four patients complained of stress incontinence without other symptoms and none of these had detrusor instability. One patient from a group of 25 who had frequency with stress incontinence had low bladder compliance but the others had normal urodynamic studies. Of the 10 patients with urgency in addition to stress incontinence, 5 had unstable bladders. A detailed urological history must be taken in all patients who are assessed for stress incontinence. Urodynamics are unnecessary in patients with stress incontinence alone but should be considered in those with additional urgency.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A urological and urodynamic database was used in a prospective study of female patients whose initial symptom was stress incontinence alone. The urodynamic diagnoses in 89 such patients were analysed against any additional symptoms. Fifty-four patients complained of stress incontinence without other symptoms and none of these had detrusor instability. One patient from a group of 25 who had frequency with stress incontinence had low bladder compliance but the others had normal urodynamic studies. Of the 10 patients with urgency in addition to stress incontinence, 5 had unstable bladders. A detailed urological history must be taken in all patients who are assessed for stress incontinence. Urodynamics are unnecessary in patients with stress incontinence alone but should be considered in those with additional urgency.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A urological and urodynamic database was used in a prospective study of female patients whose initial symptom was stress incontinence alone. The urodynamic diagnoses in 89 such patients were analysed against any additional symptoms. Fifty-four patients complained of stress incontinence without other symptoms and none of these had detrusor instability. One patient from a group of 25 who had frequency with stress incontinence had low bladder compliance but the others had normal urodynamic studies. Of the 10 patients with urgency in addition to stress incontinence, 5 had unstable bladders. A detailed urological history must be taken in all patients who are assessed for stress incontinence. Urodynamics are unnecessary in patients with stress incontinence alone but should be considered in those with additional urgency.

Key concepts: Detrusor instability, Stress incontinence, Medicine, Urodynamic testing, Urge incontinence, Urinary incontinence, Urology, Urodynamic studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source