1987AIAA JournalRequires access

Prediction of sound fields in cavities using boundary-element methods

Robert J. Bernhard, Bryce Gardner, C. G. Mollo, Christian Kipp

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

Two boundary element formulations of acoustical behavior exist; the Direct Boundary Element Methods (DBEM) based on the Helmholtz Integral Equations and the Indirect Boundary Element Methods (IBEM) based on Huygen's Principle. In this investigation, both methods are implemented utilizing a simple linear superparametric element. In addition the IBEM is studied using a quadratic isoparametric element. The accuracy and relative efficiency of the various techniques are examined. In order to properly model aircraft interior cavities the additional capability to model wall treatments and internal point sources is added to the methods. The procedures are verified for several well-understood cavity problems. The relative merits of each boundary element method and the finite element method are examined.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two boundary element formulations of acoustical behavior exist; the Direct Boundary Element Methods (DBEM) based on the Helmholtz Integral Equations and the Indirect Boundary Element Methods (IBEM) based on Huygen's Principle. In this investigation, both methods are implemented utilizing a simple linear superparametric element. In addition the IBEM is studied using a quadratic isoparametric element. The accuracy and relative efficiency of the various techniques are examined. In order to properly model aircraft interior cavities the additional capability to model wall treatments and internal point sources is added to the methods. The procedures are verified for several well-understood cavity problems. The relative merits of each boundary element method and the finite element method are examined.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two boundary element formulations of acoustical behavior exist; the Direct Boundary Element Methods (DBEM) based on the Helmholtz Integral Equations and the Indirect Boundary Element Methods (IBEM) based on Huygen's Principle. In this investigation, both methods are implemented utilizing a simple linear superparametric element. In addition the IBEM is studied using a quadratic isoparametric element. The accuracy and relative efficiency of the various techniques are examined. In order to properly model aircraft interior cavities the additional capability to model wall treatments and internal point sources is added to the methods. The procedures are verified for several well-understood cavity problems. The relative merits of each boundary element method and the finite element method are examined.

Key concepts: Boundary element method, Boundary knot method, Helmholtz free energy, Boundary (topology), Quadratic equation, Method of fundamental solutions, Singular boundary method, Mathematical analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prediction of sound fields in cavities using boundary-element methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens