1997CYTOLOGIAOpen access

Comparative Analysis of the Karyotypes of the Greater Long-Tailed Hamster and the Chinese Hamster.

Kazunori Fujimoto, Sen‐ichi Oda, Kazuhiro Koyasu, Masashi Harada, Shin‐ichi Sonta

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The G-, R-and C-banded karyotypes of the two hamster species, the greater long-tailed hamster (Cricetulus triton or Tscherskia triton) and the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus), were analyzed. The diploid chromosome number of Chinese hamster is 22, and that of the greater longtailed hamster 28. These are morphological differences between two hamster species : the number of metacentric and submetacentric autosomes was only 4 in the greater long-tailed hamster, in contrast to 14 in the Chinese hamster, while the number of acrocentric and subtelocentric chromosome was 22 in the greater long-tailed hamster and 6 in the Chinese hamster. The analysis of banding patterns in the two hamster species revealed that each chromosome of the greater long-tailed hamster corresponded to one arm or one whole chromosome of the Chinese hamster. However, the large C-bands (or lightly stained with R-bands) such as those found around the centromeric region of the greaterlong-tailed hamster chromosomes did not exhist in the centromeric region, or any other segments, of any chromosome in the Chinese hamster. These findings may be related to the karyotypical evolution of the two hamster species, but it is difficult to say which these hamster species are belonged to the same genus Cricetulus or not.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The G-, R-and C-banded karyotypes of the two hamster species, the greater long-tailed hamster (Cricetulus triton or Tscherskia triton) and the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus), were analyzed. The diploid chromosome number of Chinese hamster is 22, and that of the greater longtailed hamster 28. These are morphological differences between two hamster species : the number of metacentric and submetacentric autosomes was only 4 in the greater long-tailed hamster, in contrast to 14 in the Chinese hamster, while the number of acrocentric and subtelocentric chromosome was 22 in the greater long-tailed hamster and 6 in the Chinese hamster. The analysis of banding patterns in the two hamster species revealed that each chromosome of the greater long-tailed hamster corresponded to one arm or one whole chromosome of the Chinese hamster. However, the large C-bands (or lightly stained with R-bands) such as those found around the centromeric region of the greaterlong-tailed hamster chromosomes did not exhist in the centromeric region, or any other segments, of any chromosome in the Chinese hamster. These findings may be related to the karyotypical evolution of the two hamster species, but it is difficult to say which these hamster species are belonged to the same genus Cricetulus or not.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The G-, R-and C-banded karyotypes of the two hamster species, the greater long-tailed hamster (Cricetulus triton or Tscherskia triton) and the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus), were analyzed. The diploid chromosome number of Chinese hamster is 22, and that of the greater longtailed hamster 28. These are morphological differences between two hamster species : the number of metacentric and submetacentric autosomes was only 4 in the greater long-tailed hamster, in contrast to 14 in the Chinese hamster, while the number of acrocentric and subtelocentric chromosome was 22 in the greater long-tailed hamster and 6 in the Chinese hamster. The analysis of banding patterns in the two hamster species revealed that each chromosome of the greater long-tailed hamster corresponded to one arm or one whole chromosome of the Chinese hamster. However, the large C-bands (or lightly stained with R-bands) such as those found around the centromeric region of the greaterlong-tailed hamster chromosomes did not exhist in the centromeric region, or any other segments, of any chromosome in the Chinese hamster. These findings may be related to the karyotypical evolution of the two hamster species, but it is difficult to say which these hamster species are belonged to the same genus Cricetulus or not.

Key concepts: Hamster, Chinese hamster, Biology, Cricetulus, Genetics, Karyotype, Chromosome, Mesocricetus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Analysis of the Karyotypes of the Greater Long-Tailed Hamster and the Chinese Hamster. — Research Paper | ScholarLens