2014The Journal of Private EquityRequires access

The Coefficient of Determination for ListedPrivate Equity Funds

Manu Sharma, Gunwant Singh, Puneet Gupta, Esha Prashar

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The performance of thirteen private equity (PE) firms listed in U.S. and having operations in North America was compared with the performance of a diversified investment portfolio. The Sharpe and Treynor ratio results indicate that a majority of these PE firms beat the major U.S. stock indices. An attempt was made determine the best predictors for each of the PE firms. The predictor variables used to establish the relationship include various market indexes: DJIA, NYSE, NASDAQ, S&P 400, S&P 500, and S&P 600. The predictive relationship with market variables could not be established for a majority of firms. Seven out of the thirteen funds showed no significant relationship with market variables. The predictive relationship could be established only for six out of the thirteen firms. In the case of three out of the six PE firms, the best predictor relationship was a single market variable. TOPICS:Private equity, statistical methods, performance measurement

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The performance of thirteen private equity (PE) firms listed in U.S. and having operations in North America was compared with the performance of a diversified investment portfolio. The Sharpe and Treynor ratio results indicate that a majority of these PE firms beat the major U.S. stock indices. An attempt was made determine the best predictors for each of the PE firms. The predictor variables used to establish the relationship include various market indexes: DJIA, NYSE, NASDAQ, S&P 400, S&P 500, and S&P 600. The predictive relationship with market variables could not be established for a majority of firms. Seven out of the thirteen funds showed no significant relationship with market variables. The predictive relationship could be established only for six out of the thirteen firms. In the case of three out of the six PE firms, the best predictor relationship was a single market variable. TOPICS:Private equity, statistical methods, performance measurement

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The performance of thirteen private equity (PE) firms listed in U.S. and having operations in North America was compared with the performance of a diversified investment portfolio. The Sharpe and Treynor ratio results indicate that a majority of these PE firms beat the major U.S. stock indices. An attempt was made determine the best predictors for each of the PE firms. The predictor variables used to establish the relationship include various market indexes: DJIA, NYSE, NASDAQ, S&P 400, S&P 500, and S&P 600. The predictive relationship with market variables could not be established for a majority of firms. Seven out of the thirteen funds showed no significant relationship with market variables. The predictive relationship could be established only for six out of the thirteen firms. In the case of three out of the six PE firms, the best predictor relationship was a single market variable. TOPICS:Private equity, statistical methods, performance measurement

Key concepts: Treynor ratio, Equity (law), Econometrics, Business, Sharpe ratio, Portfolio, Stock market, Financial economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Coefficient of Determination for ListedPrivate Equity Funds — Research Paper | ScholarLens