2012Journal of the Korean Society of ColoproctologyOpen access

Factors Influencing Oncologic Outcomes after Tumor-specific Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

Kil Yeon Lee

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

thors called for a more selective use of TME. The authors argue that oncologic outcome is not compromised with this approach based on similar cancer-specific survival patterns between TME and PME in this study. This conclusion was confirmed by meta-analysis. Mirnezami et al. [6] examined the long-term oncological impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery using meta-analysis methods. They found that anastomotic leakage has a negative impact on local recurrence after the rectal cancer surgery. A significant association between anastomotic leakage and reduced long-term cancer specific survival was also noted. Junginger and Hermanek [7] reviewed the literature concerning oncologic outcomes after the rectal surgery. The authors recom-mended PME, if the rectal cancer is located 12 to 16 cm from anal verge. Oncologic outcomes after the rectal cancer surgery can be di-

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

thors called for a more selective use of TME. The authors argue that oncologic outcome is not compromised with this approach based on similar cancer-specific survival patterns between TME and PME in this study. This conclusion was confirmed by meta-analysis. Mirnezami et al. [6] examined the long-term oncological impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery using meta-analysis methods. They found that anastomotic leakage has a negative impact on local recurrence after the rectal cancer surgery. A significant association between anastomotic leakage and reduced long-term cancer specific survival was also noted. Junginger and Hermanek [7] reviewed the literature concerning oncologic outcomes after the rectal surgery. The authors recom-mended PME, if the rectal cancer is located 12 to 16 cm from anal verge. Oncologic outcomes after the rectal cancer surgery can be di-

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

thors called for a more selective use of TME. The authors argue that oncologic outcome is not compromised with this approach based on similar cancer-specific survival patterns between TME and PME in this study. This conclusion was confirmed by meta-analysis. Mirnezami et al. [6] examined the long-term oncological impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery using meta-analysis methods. They found that anastomotic leakage has a negative impact on local recurrence after the rectal cancer surgery. A significant association between anastomotic leakage and reduced long-term cancer specific survival was also noted. Junginger and Hermanek [7] reviewed the literature concerning oncologic outcomes after the rectal surgery. The authors recom-mended PME, if the rectal cancer is located 12 to 16 cm from anal verge. Oncologic outcomes after the rectal cancer surgery can be di-

Key concepts: Total mesorectal excision, Medicine, Mesorectum, Colorectal cancer, Rectum, Surgery, Anal verge, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Factors Influencing Oncologic Outcomes after Tumor-specific Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens