2001•International Journal of Systematic TheologyRequires access

Moltmann and the Anti‐Monotheism Movement

Randall E. Otto

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Building on the discredited work of Erik Peterson, Jürgen Moltman insists that monotheism is a foreign philosophical influence that corrupted Christianity into validating political domination. Christianity should renounce monotheism in favor of trinitarianism. Moltmann’s trinitarian God, however, can never actually exist, but must always be coming from the future, lest it lose its condition of being in presence. Moltmann’s future orientation serves as a heuristic to induce eschatological human community. The cost of accepting Moltmann’s anti‐monotheism undermines Christianity’s moorings in Judaism and the trinitarian relations of an actually existing God, all for the sake of repudiating monotheism’s ambiguous political significance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Building on the discredited work of Erik Peterson, Jürgen Moltman insists that monotheism is a foreign philosophical influence that corrupted Christianity into validating political domination. Christianity should renounce monotheism in favor of trinitarianism. Moltmann’s trinitarian God, however, can never actually exist, but must always be coming from the future, lest it lose its condition of being in presence. Moltmann’s future orientation serves as a heuristic to induce eschatological human community. The cost of accepting Moltmann’s anti‐monotheism undermines Christianity’s moorings in Judaism and the trinitarian relations of an actually existing God, all for the sake of repudiating monotheism’s ambiguous political significance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Building on the discredited work of Erik Peterson, Jürgen Moltman insists that monotheism is a foreign philosophical influence that corrupted Christianity into validating political domination. Christianity should renounce monotheism in favor of trinitarianism. Moltmann’s trinitarian God, however, can never actually exist, but must always be coming from the future, lest it lose its condition of being in presence. Moltmann’s future orientation serves as a heuristic to induce eschatological human community. The cost of accepting Moltmann’s anti‐monotheism undermines Christianity’s moorings in Judaism and the trinitarian relations of an actually existing God, all for the sake of repudiating monotheism’s ambiguous political significance.

Key concepts: Monotheism, Philosophy, Movement (music), Theology, Aesthetics, Islam

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Moltmann and the Anti‐Monotheism Movement — Research Paper | ScholarLens