1985British Journal of RadiologyRequires access

“Gray's Anatomy”

Roger Warwick, Peter Williams, Mary Dyson, Laurie Bannister

Open publisher page 4,544 citations

Abstract

The comparison, made by Dr. W. D. Jeans in your last issue*, of Gray's Anatomy with the latest revision of its American offspring is an interesting exercise; but his conclusion that the original is a ‘better buy’, though pleasing to the producers of the “British” Gray's Anatomy, a much larger and more up-to-date book, is based upon the false premise that a second version is necessary. Here a little history helps: the first edition, published by Parker and the copyright at once purchased by Longmans, was immediately popular and must have contributed much to the profits of the latter firm.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The comparison, made by Dr. W. D. Jeans in your last issue*, of Gray's Anatomy with the latest revision of its American offspring is an interesting exercise; but his conclusion that the original is a ‘better buy’, though pleasing to the producers of the “British” Gray's Anatomy, a much larger and more up-to-date book, is based upon the false premise that a second version is necessary. Here a little history helps: the first edition, published by Parker and the copyright at once purchased by Longmans, was immediately popular and must have contributed much to the profits of the latter firm.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4544 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The comparison, made by Dr. W. D. Jeans in your last issue*, of Gray's Anatomy with the latest revision of its American offspring is an interesting exercise; but his conclusion that the original is a ‘better buy’, though pleasing to the producers of the “British” Gray's Anatomy, a much larger and more up-to-date book, is based upon the false premise that a second version is necessary. Here a little history helps: the first edition, published by Parker and the copyright at once purchased by Longmans, was immediately popular and must have contributed much to the profits of the latter firm.

Key concepts: Gray (unit), Anatomy, Premise, Medicine, Philosophy, Radiology, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
“Gray's Anatomy” — Research Paper | ScholarLens