1981American Journal of PhysicsRequires access

Electromagnetic mass, relativity, and the Kaufmann experiments

James T. Cushing

Open publisher page 66 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the theoretical background for and the detailed analysis of Kaufmann’s 1901–1905 experiments to determine the e/m ratio for fast electrons. Far from providing the first experimental confirmation of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, as is often claimed in physics textbooks today, these data were initially interpreted as confirming Abraham’s classical model of a rigid spherical electron and as providing evidence against special relativity. Only in 1906–1907, upon Planck’s subsequent reanalysis of Kaufmann’s 1905 data, did these experiments become evidence marginally in favor of relativity over classical models of the electron. This particular issue, of the superiority of special realtivity over classical theory in providing a fit to e/m determinations, was not definitely settled until 1914 with new extensive and accurate data obtained by Neumann. The entire episode provides another example that science does not proceed by a strict falsificationist methodology. It shows rather that a great scientist such as Einstein at times gives more weight to a theory that has a certain beauty and produces equations simple in form than he does to experimental results that apparently conflict with such a theory.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents the theoretical background for and the detailed analysis of Kaufmann’s 1901–1905 experiments to determine the e/m ratio for fast electrons. Far from providing the first experimental confirmation of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, as is often claimed in physics textbooks today, these data were initially interpreted as confirming Abraham’s classical model of a rigid spherical electron and as providing evidence against special relativity. Only in 1906–1907, upon Planck’s subsequent reanalysis of Kaufmann’s 1905 data, did these experiments become evidence marginally in favor of relativity over classical models of the electron. This particular issue, of the superiority of special realtivity over classical theory in providing a fit to e/m determinations, was not definitely settled until 1914 with new extensive and accurate data obtained by Neumann. The entire episode provides another example that science does not proceed by a strict falsificationist methodology. It shows rather that a great scientist such as Einstein at times gives more weight to a theory that has a certain beauty and produces equations simple in form than he does to experimental results that apparently conflict with such a theory.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 66 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents the theoretical background for and the detailed analysis of Kaufmann’s 1901–1905 experiments to determine the e/m ratio for fast electrons. Far from providing the first experimental confirmation of Einstein’s special theory of relativity, as is often claimed in physics textbooks today, these data were initially interpreted as confirming Abraham’s classical model of a rigid spherical electron and as providing evidence against special relativity. Only in 1906–1907, upon Planck’s subsequent reanalysis of Kaufmann’s 1905 data, did these experiments become evidence marginally in favor of relativity over classical models of the electron. This particular issue, of the superiority of special realtivity over classical theory in providing a fit to e/m determinations, was not definitely settled until 1914 with new extensive and accurate data obtained by Neumann. The entire episode provides another example that science does not proceed by a strict falsificationist methodology. It shows rather that a great scientist such as Einstein at times gives more weight to a theory that has a certain beauty and produces equations simple in form than he does to experimental results that apparently conflict with such a theory.

Key concepts: Physics, Einstein, Theory of relativity, Planck, Theoretical physics, Special relativity, Simple (philosophy), General relativity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electromagnetic mass, relativity, and the Kaufmann experiments — Research Paper | ScholarLens