2013Journal of VisionOpen access

Temporal Oculomotor Inhibition of Return and Spatial Facilitation of Return in a Visual Encoding Task

Steven G. Luke, Joseph Schmidt, John M. Henderson

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Oculomotor inhibition of return (O-IOR) is an increase in saccade latency when returning to a recently fixated location relative to other locations. It has been proposed that this temporal O-IOR has spatial consequences, facilitating foraging by inhibiting return to previously attended regions (Klein & MacInnes, 1998). Models of visual attention incorporate this spatial IOR effect to drive attention to new locations. However, the foraging facilitator hypothesis has been a matter of debate recently in the scene literature, with several studies observing increased rather than decreased return probability (Hooge et al., 2005; Smith & Henderson, 2009, 2011a,b). To test whether spatial O-IOR occurs and can facilitate foraging, we monitored participants’ eye movements while they viewed arrays of objects or words. Arrays were chosen over scenes because arrays offer the advantage that fixation locations can be unambiguously assigned to specific objects. Temporal O-IOR was observed for both objects and words, but there was no evidence for spatial O-IOR. Instead, we observed spatial facilitation of return; participants were more likely than chance to refixate just-visited locations. Further, the likelihood of making a return saccade to an object or word was contingent on time spent previously on that object or word, suggesting that return saccades are triggered when further visual information is needed. The results also revealed strong evidence for saccadic momentum, an oculomotor bias to repeat the most recently executed saccade program. Such repetitions were the most frequently-occurring saccades in our data. Taken together, these results suggest that inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator. We suggest that models of visual attention could incorporate saccadic momentum as a foraging facilitator instead of O-IOR. We further suggest that such models should incorporate a mechanism that triggers return saccades when more information is needed from a location. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Oculomotor inhibition of return (O-IOR) is an increase in saccade latency when returning to a recently fixated location relative to other locations. It has been proposed that this temporal O-IOR has spatial consequences, facilitating foraging by inhibiting return to previously attended regions (Klein & MacInnes, 1998). Models of visual attention incorporate this spatial IOR effect to drive attention to new locations. However, the foraging facilitator hypothesis has been a matter of debate recently in the scene literature, with several studies observing increased rather than decreased return probability (Hooge et al., 2005; Smith & Henderson, 2009, 2011a,b). To test whether spatial O-IOR occurs and can facilitate foraging, we monitored participants’ eye movements while they viewed arrays of objects or words. Arrays were chosen over scenes because arrays offer the advantage that fixation locations can be unambiguously assigned to specific objects. Temporal O-IOR was observed for both objects and words, but there was no evidence for spatial O-IOR. Instead, we observed spatial facilitation of return; participants were more likely than chance to refixate just-visited locations. Further, the likelihood of making a return saccade to an object or word was contingent on time spent previously on that object or word, suggesting that return saccades are triggered when further visual information is needed. The results also revealed strong evidence for saccadic momentum, an oculomotor bias to repeat the most recently executed saccade program. Such repetitions were the most frequently-occurring saccades in our data. Taken together, these results suggest that inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator. We suggest that models of visual attention could incorporate saccadic momentum as a foraging facilitator instead of O-IOR. We further suggest that such models should incorporate a mechanism that triggers return saccades when more information is needed from a location. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Oculomotor inhibition of return (O-IOR) is an increase in saccade latency when returning to a recently fixated location relative to other locations. It has been proposed that this temporal O-IOR has spatial consequences, facilitating foraging by inhibiting return to previously attended regions (Klein & MacInnes, 1998). Models of visual attention incorporate this spatial IOR effect to drive attention to new locations. However, the foraging facilitator hypothesis has been a matter of debate recently in the scene literature, with several studies observing increased rather than decreased return probability (Hooge et al., 2005; Smith & Henderson, 2009, 2011a,b). To test whether spatial O-IOR occurs and can facilitate foraging, we monitored participants’ eye movements while they viewed arrays of objects or words. Arrays were chosen over scenes because arrays offer the advantage that fixation locations can be unambiguously assigned to specific objects. Temporal O-IOR was observed for both objects and words, but there was no evidence for spatial O-IOR. Instead, we observed spatial facilitation of return; participants were more likely than chance to refixate just-visited locations. Further, the likelihood of making a return saccade to an object or word was contingent on time spent previously on that object or word, suggesting that return saccades are triggered when further visual information is needed. The results also revealed strong evidence for saccadic momentum, an oculomotor bias to repeat the most recently executed saccade program. Such repetitions were the most frequently-occurring saccades in our data. Taken together, these results suggest that inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator. We suggest that models of visual attention could incorporate saccadic momentum as a foraging facilitator instead of O-IOR. We further suggest that such models should incorporate a mechanism that triggers return saccades when more information is needed from a location. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

Key concepts: Inhibition of return, Saccade, Saccadic masking, Facilitation, Eye movement, Cognitive psychology, Visual search, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Temporal Oculomotor Inhibition of Return and Spatial Facilitation of Return in a Visual Encoding Task — Research Paper | ScholarLens