The use of injectable antibiotics in two general hospitals
Richard Slack, R. G. Finch, K. J. Towner, P. Bendall
Abstract
Richard Slack, R. G. Finch, K. J. Towner, P. Bendall
Abstract
Injectable antibiotic use in Nottingham has shown a change in the past 3 years: the quantity of cefotaxime and cefuroxime prescribed by the end of 1983 was double that of aminoglycosides. The majority (69%) of use of the newer cephalosporins is for prophylaxis. This significant increase in use of cephalosporins has not been accompanied by an increase in bacterial resistance to cefuroxime or cefotaxime. However, these two agents cause the majority of toxin-positive antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in Nottingham hospitals.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Injectable antibiotic use in Nottingham has shown a change in the past 3 years: the quantity of cefotaxime and cefuroxime prescribed by the end of 1983 was double that of aminoglycosides. The majority (69%) of use of the newer cephalosporins is for prophylaxis. This significant increase in use of cephalosporins has not been accompanied by an increase in bacterial resistance to cefuroxime or cefotaxime. However, these two agents cause the majority of toxin-positive antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in Nottingham hospitals.
Key concepts: Cefuroxime, Cefotaxime, Cephalosporin, Medicine, Antibiotics, Antibiotic resistance, Intensive care medicine, Microbiology