2002•Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietyRequires access

Aspects of the parametrization of organized convection: contrasting cloud‐resolving model and single‐column model realizations

David Gregory, Françoise Guichard

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Abstract Cloud‐resolving model (CRM) simulations of organized tropical convection observed in the Tropical Ocean/Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment are used to evaluate versions of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts convection and cloud schemes in single‐column model simulations. Emphasis is placed upon the ability of the convection scheme to represent ‘convective‐scale’ processes with typically mode‐1 heating structures through the troposphere, together with a cloud scheme representing the ‘stratiform (mesoscale) component’ with upper‐level heating and low‐level cooling due to the evaporation of precipitation. While diagnosis of convective and stratiform precipitation is sensitive to the sampling criteria applied to the CRM, vertical structures of the mass and heat budgets are robust. Using diagnostics from the CRM simulations as a guide, revisions to the convection and cloud schemes are suggested in order to enable the parametrization to represent the two scales. The study suggests that a mass‐flux convection scheme linked via detrainment to a prognostic treatment of cloud can represent organized convection, provided that the upward motion in the upper‐level stratiform cloud is considered. Copyright © 2002 Royal Meteorological Society

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Cloud‐resolving model (CRM) simulations of organized tropical convection observed in the Tropical Ocean/Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment are used to evaluate versions of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts convection and cloud schemes in single‐column model simulations. Emphasis is placed upon the ability of the convection scheme to represent ‘convective‐scale’ processes with typically mode‐1 heating structures through the troposphere, together with a cloud scheme representing the ‘stratiform (mesoscale) component’ with upper‐level heating and low‐level cooling due to the evaporation of precipitation. While diagnosis of convective and stratiform precipitation is sensitive to the sampling criteria applied to the CRM, vertical structures of the mass and heat budgets are robust. Using diagnostics from the CRM simulations as a guide, revisions to the convection and cloud schemes are suggested in order to enable the parametrization to represent the two scales. The study suggests that a mass‐flux convection scheme linked via detrainment to a prognostic treatment of cloud can represent organized convection, provided that the upward motion in the upper‐level stratiform cloud is considered. Copyright © 2002 Royal Meteorological Society

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Cloud‐resolving model (CRM) simulations of organized tropical convection observed in the Tropical Ocean/Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment are used to evaluate versions of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts convection and cloud schemes in single‐column model simulations. Emphasis is placed upon the ability of the convection scheme to represent ‘convective‐scale’ processes with typically mode‐1 heating structures through the troposphere, together with a cloud scheme representing the ‘stratiform (mesoscale) component’ with upper‐level heating and low‐level cooling due to the evaporation of precipitation. While diagnosis of convective and stratiform precipitation is sensitive to the sampling criteria applied to the CRM, vertical structures of the mass and heat budgets are robust. Using diagnostics from the CRM simulations as a guide, revisions to the convection and cloud schemes are suggested in order to enable the parametrization to represent the two scales. The study suggests that a mass‐flux convection scheme linked via detrainment to a prognostic treatment of cloud can represent organized convection, provided that the upward motion in the upper‐level stratiform cloud is considered. Copyright © 2002 Royal Meteorological Society

Key concepts: Parametrization (atmospheric modeling), Convection, Atmospheric convection, Mesoscale meteorology, Meteorology, Precipitation, Cloud computing, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Aspects of the parametrization of organized convection: contrasting cloud‐resolving model and single‐column model realizations — Research Paper | ScholarLens