1995Security StudiesRequires access

How democracies differ: Public opinion, state structure, and the lessons of the Fashoda crisis

Susan Peterson

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

(1995). How democracies differ: Public opinion, state structure, and the lessons of the Fashoda crisis. Security Studies: Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 3-37.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

(1995). How democracies differ: Public opinion, state structure, and the lessons of the Fashoda crisis. Security Studies: Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 3-37.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

(1995). How democracies differ: Public opinion, state structure, and the lessons of the Fashoda crisis. Security Studies: Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 3-37.

Key concepts: Public opinion, Political science, State (computer science), Political economy, Public administration, Law, Sociology, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How democracies differ: Public opinion, state structure, and the lessons of the Fashoda crisis — Research Paper | ScholarLens