2003New England Journal of MedicineRequires access

The Electrocardiogram in Acute Myocardial Infarction

John E. Madias

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

to the editor: The review article by Zimetbaum and Josephson (March 6 issue) 1 on the usefulness of the electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is essential reading for anyone who cares for patients with a suspected acute myocardial infarction. Some qualifications regarding the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle-branch block are in order. Although proposed criteria 2 facilitate the diagnosis, an occasional problem arises when reliance on the criterion of an ST-segment elevation of more than 5.0 mm in leads with primarily negative QRS complexes leads to a false positive diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. This criterion is nonspecific for acute myocardial infarction, and some patients who have left bundle-branch block without an acute myocardial infarction, but with left ventricular hypertrophy or dilatation, have electrocardiograms with ST-segment elevations that are much larger than 5.0 mm. 3,4 An association between large ST-segment elevations and large QRS complexes has been reported. 3 Repeating electrocardiography may also be of value, since a change in the amplitude of the ST-segment elevation suggests an acute myocardial infarction. 5 Finally, since measurements of ST-segment elevations are being used for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle-branch block, it is prudent to mark the thorax in order to ensure reproducible serial electrocardiograms. 5

About this research paper

What this paper is about

to the editor: The review article by Zimetbaum and Josephson (March 6 issue) 1 on the usefulness of the electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is essential reading for anyone who cares for patients with a suspected acute myocardial infarction. Some qualifications regarding the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle-branch block are in order. Although proposed criteria 2 facilitate the diagnosis, an occasional problem arises when reliance on the criterion of an ST-segment elevation of more than 5.0 mm in leads with primarily negative QRS complexes leads to a false positive diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. This criterion is nonspecific for acute myocardial infarction, and some patients who have left bundle-branch block without an acute myocardial infarction, but with left ventricular hypertrophy or dilatation, have electrocardiograms with ST-segment elevations that are much larger than 5.0 mm. 3,4 An association between large ST-segment elevations and large QRS complexes has been reported. 3 Repeating electrocardiography may also be of value, since a change in the amplitude of the ST-segment elevation suggests an acute myocardial infarction. 5 Finally, since measurements of ST-segment elevations are being used for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle-branch block, it is prudent to mark the thorax in order to ensure reproducible serial electrocardiograms. 5

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

to the editor: The review article by Zimetbaum and Josephson (March 6 issue) 1 on the usefulness of the electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is essential reading for anyone who cares for patients with a suspected acute myocardial infarction. Some qualifications regarding the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle-branch block are in order. Although proposed criteria 2 facilitate the diagnosis, an occasional problem arises when reliance on the criterion of an ST-segment elevation of more than 5.0 mm in leads with primarily negative QRS complexes leads to a false positive diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. This criterion is nonspecific for acute myocardial infarction, and some patients who have left bundle-branch block without an acute myocardial infarction, but with left ventricular hypertrophy or dilatation, have electrocardiograms with ST-segment elevations that are much larger than 5.0 mm. 3,4 An association between large ST-segment elevations and large QRS complexes has been reported. 3 Repeating electrocardiography may also be of value, since a change in the amplitude of the ST-segment elevation suggests an acute myocardial infarction. 5 Finally, since measurements of ST-segment elevations are being used for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle-branch block, it is prudent to mark the thorax in order to ensure reproducible serial electrocardiograms. 5

Key concepts: Medicine, Myocardial infarction, Cardiology, Electrocardiography, Internal medicine, Medical emergency, Intensive care medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Electrocardiogram in Acute Myocardial Infarction — Research Paper | ScholarLens