Reluctant Liberator: Theodore Roosevelt's Philosophy of Self‐Government and Preparation for Philippine Independence
Stephen Wertheim
Abstract
Stephen Wertheim
Abstract
Theodore Roosevelt is well known as an imperialist. The common understanding is both too weak and too strong. Too weak, because Roosevelt idealized an imperialism that could last forever in civilizing savages. Too strong, because Roosevelt prepared the American‐occupied Philippines for independence within a generation. This article analyzes Roosevelt's philosophy of self‐government and reinterprets his Philippines policy in light of the philosophy. Roosevelt emerges as a reluctant anti‐imperialist—an imperialist by desire but an anti‐imperialist in governance. His imperialist ambitions were thwarted by America's ideals of self‐government and its democratic political system, channeled through the powers of Congress and the process of regular elections. At a crest of imperial opportunity, America eschewed empire. Imperial occupation remained a great aberration in American foreign relations.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Theodore Roosevelt is well known as an imperialist. The common understanding is both too weak and too strong. Too weak, because Roosevelt idealized an imperialism that could last forever in civilizing savages. Too strong, because Roosevelt prepared the American‐occupied Philippines for independence within a generation. This article analyzes Roosevelt's philosophy of self‐government and reinterprets his Philippines policy in light of the philosophy. Roosevelt emerges as a reluctant anti‐imperialist—an imperialist by desire but an anti‐imperialist in governance. His imperialist ambitions were thwarted by America's ideals of self‐government and its democratic political system, channeled through the powers of Congress and the process of regular elections. At a crest of imperial opportunity, America eschewed empire. Imperial occupation remained a great aberration in American foreign relations.
Key concepts: Empire, Independence (probability theory), Democracy, Government (linguistics), Political science, Political economy, Politics, Economic history