2009Presidential Studies QuarterlyRequires access

Reluctant Liberator: Theodore Roosevelt's Philosophy of Self‐Government and Preparation for Philippine Independence

Stephen Wertheim

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Theodore Roosevelt is well known as an imperialist. The common understanding is both too weak and too strong. Too weak, because Roosevelt idealized an imperialism that could last forever in civilizing savages. Too strong, because Roosevelt prepared the American‐occupied Philippines for independence within a generation. This article analyzes Roosevelt's philosophy of self‐government and reinterprets his Philippines policy in light of the philosophy. Roosevelt emerges as a reluctant anti‐imperialist—an imperialist by desire but an anti‐imperialist in governance. His imperialist ambitions were thwarted by America's ideals of self‐government and its democratic political system, channeled through the powers of Congress and the process of regular elections. At a crest of imperial opportunity, America eschewed empire. Imperial occupation remained a great aberration in American foreign relations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Theodore Roosevelt is well known as an imperialist. The common understanding is both too weak and too strong. Too weak, because Roosevelt idealized an imperialism that could last forever in civilizing savages. Too strong, because Roosevelt prepared the American‐occupied Philippines for independence within a generation. This article analyzes Roosevelt's philosophy of self‐government and reinterprets his Philippines policy in light of the philosophy. Roosevelt emerges as a reluctant anti‐imperialist—an imperialist by desire but an anti‐imperialist in governance. His imperialist ambitions were thwarted by America's ideals of self‐government and its democratic political system, channeled through the powers of Congress and the process of regular elections. At a crest of imperial opportunity, America eschewed empire. Imperial occupation remained a great aberration in American foreign relations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Theodore Roosevelt is well known as an imperialist. The common understanding is both too weak and too strong. Too weak, because Roosevelt idealized an imperialism that could last forever in civilizing savages. Too strong, because Roosevelt prepared the American‐occupied Philippines for independence within a generation. This article analyzes Roosevelt's philosophy of self‐government and reinterprets his Philippines policy in light of the philosophy. Roosevelt emerges as a reluctant anti‐imperialist—an imperialist by desire but an anti‐imperialist in governance. His imperialist ambitions were thwarted by America's ideals of self‐government and its democratic political system, channeled through the powers of Congress and the process of regular elections. At a crest of imperial opportunity, America eschewed empire. Imperial occupation remained a great aberration in American foreign relations.

Key concepts: Empire, Independence (probability theory), Democracy, Government (linguistics), Political science, Political economy, Politics, Economic history

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reluctant Liberator: Theodore Roosevelt's Philosophy of Self‐Government and Preparation for Philippine Independence — Research Paper | ScholarLens