Performance Test of Electric Pocket Dosimeter.
Takao Kawano, Hiroshi Ebihara
Abstract
Open-access reader
Takao Kawano, Hiroshi Ebihara
Abstract
Open-access reader
Several types of electric pocket dosimeters have been developed recently. These dosimeters are distinguished by use of the silicone semiconductor as a radiation (γ-ray, X-ray) detector. Performance tests of a type of dosimeter named the PDM102 were carried out by using a 60CO point source (about 500kBq). The results showed that the minimum detectable dose equivalent for the dosimeter was 1-2μSv. Excluding cases of exposure from the underside or back of the dosimeter and exposure of less than 10μSv, differences between measured and calculated dose equivalents were less than 10%. Consequently the effect of the dose equivalent rate and dose equivalent (>10μSv) on the response of the detectors was determined to be less than 10%, and the directional dependence was also less than 10%. The dosimeter's response for back exposure was about 70-80% of that for front exposure. And for exposure from the underside of the dosimeter, the measured dose equivalents were equal to or less than approximately 50% of the calculated dose equivalents.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Several types of electric pocket dosimeters have been developed recently. These dosimeters are distinguished by use of the silicone semiconductor as a radiation (γ-ray, X-ray) detector. Performance tests of a type of dosimeter named the PDM102 were carried out by using a 60CO point source (about 500kBq). The results showed that the minimum detectable dose equivalent for the dosimeter was 1-2μSv. Excluding cases of exposure from the underside or back of the dosimeter and exposure of less than 10μSv, differences between measured and calculated dose equivalents were less than 10%. Consequently the effect of the dose equivalent rate and dose equivalent (>10μSv) on the response of the detectors was determined to be less than 10%, and the directional dependence was also less than 10%. The dosimeter's response for back exposure was about 70-80% of that for front exposure. And for exposure from the underside of the dosimeter, the measured dose equivalents were equal to or less than approximately 50% of the calculated dose equivalents.
Key concepts: Dosimeter, Equivalent dose, Nuclear medicine, Dose rate, Dosimetry, Materials science, Detector, Radiation