2001Journal of Applied Polymer ScienceRequires access

Molecular parameters and their relation to the adhesive performance of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives

Singa D. Tobing, Andrew Klein

Open publisher page 233 citations

Abstract

Model acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs) based on poly(2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate-stat-acrylic acid) and poly(n-butyl acrylate-stat-acrylic acid) at 97.5/2.5 wt % were synthesized using semicontinuous emulsion and solution polymerizations. Microgels formed in the lattices retained their discrete network morphology in the film. In contrast, acrylic solution was essentially gel free and crosslinking in the film was provided by the reaction of acrylic acid and post added Al Acetyl Acetonate after solvent evaporation, which led to continuous network morphology. The difference in film network morphology caused significantly lower shear holding power for the film from emulsion PSA compared with that of solvent-borne film. Unlike shear holding power, loop tack and peel of acrylic PSAs were mainly controlled by the same sol/gel molecular parameters, regardless of emulsion or solution PSAs. The important molecular parameters are sol-to-gel ratio, entanglement molecular weight, weight average molecular weight, and to a lesser extent, glass transition temperature. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2230–2244, 2001

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Model acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs) based on poly(2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate-stat-acrylic acid) and poly(n-butyl acrylate-stat-acrylic acid) at 97.5/2.5 wt % were synthesized using semicontinuous emulsion and solution polymerizations. Microgels formed in the lattices retained their discrete network morphology in the film. In contrast, acrylic solution was essentially gel free and crosslinking in the film was provided by the reaction of acrylic acid and post added Al Acetyl Acetonate after solvent evaporation, which led to continuous network morphology. The difference in film network morphology caused significantly lower shear holding power for the film from emulsion PSA compared with that of solvent-borne film. Unlike shear holding power, loop tack and peel of acrylic PSAs were mainly controlled by the same sol/gel molecular parameters, regardless of emulsion or solution PSAs. The important molecular parameters are sol-to-gel ratio, entanglement molecular weight, weight average molecular weight, and to a lesser extent, glass transition temperature. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2230–2244, 2001

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 233 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Model acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives (PSAs) based on poly(2-ethyl-hexyl acrylate-stat-acrylic acid) and poly(n-butyl acrylate-stat-acrylic acid) at 97.5/2.5 wt % were synthesized using semicontinuous emulsion and solution polymerizations. Microgels formed in the lattices retained their discrete network morphology in the film. In contrast, acrylic solution was essentially gel free and crosslinking in the film was provided by the reaction of acrylic acid and post added Al Acetyl Acetonate after solvent evaporation, which led to continuous network morphology. The difference in film network morphology caused significantly lower shear holding power for the film from emulsion PSA compared with that of solvent-borne film. Unlike shear holding power, loop tack and peel of acrylic PSAs were mainly controlled by the same sol/gel molecular parameters, regardless of emulsion or solution PSAs. The important molecular parameters are sol-to-gel ratio, entanglement molecular weight, weight average molecular weight, and to a lesser extent, glass transition temperature. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2230–2244, 2001

Key concepts: Acrylic acid, Adhesive, Acrylate, Emulsion, Polymer chemistry, Materials science, Butyl acrylate, Solvent

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Molecular parameters and their relation to the adhesive performance of acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesives — Research Paper | ScholarLens