1996•Clinical and Experimental OptometryRequires access

Pupillary dilation: the patient's perspective

John Siderov, John R Bartlett, Colin J Madigan

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

Background: Mydriatic agents are used in optometric practice to dilate the pupil and facilitate the use of techniques, such as binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy to visualise the fundus. While the effects such pharmacological agents have on the size of the pupil are obvious, information regarding the patient's perception of the effects of mydriasis is less well established.Methods: A survey of patients presenting consecutively to a suburban optometric practice was performed to document the patient's perceptions of pupillary dilation. Results: Most patients reported that mydriasis resulted in blurry vision and increased sensitivity to glare, which interfered with some aspects of their everyday life, notably driving a motor vehicle. However, the majority of patients were prepared to undergo mydriasis at future eye examinations, if required.Conclusions: Practitioners should not refrain from performing mydriatic fundus examinations simply because of a perceived inconvenience to their patients. Nevertheless, care should be exercised and patients should be informed of the potential for visual disturbances with mydriasis, especially those patients driving a motor vehicle directly after the examination.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Mydriatic agents are used in optometric practice to dilate the pupil and facilitate the use of techniques, such as binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy to visualise the fundus. While the effects such pharmacological agents have on the size of the pupil are obvious, information regarding the patient's perception of the effects of mydriasis is less well established.Methods: A survey of patients presenting consecutively to a suburban optometric practice was performed to document the patient's perceptions of pupillary dilation. Results: Most patients reported that mydriasis resulted in blurry vision and increased sensitivity to glare, which interfered with some aspects of their everyday life, notably driving a motor vehicle. However, the majority of patients were prepared to undergo mydriasis at future eye examinations, if required.Conclusions: Practitioners should not refrain from performing mydriatic fundus examinations simply because of a perceived inconvenience to their patients. Nevertheless, care should be exercised and patients should be informed of the potential for visual disturbances with mydriasis, especially those patients driving a motor vehicle directly after the examination.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Mydriatic agents are used in optometric practice to dilate the pupil and facilitate the use of techniques, such as binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy to visualise the fundus. While the effects such pharmacological agents have on the size of the pupil are obvious, information regarding the patient's perception of the effects of mydriasis is less well established.Methods: A survey of patients presenting consecutively to a suburban optometric practice was performed to document the patient's perceptions of pupillary dilation. Results: Most patients reported that mydriasis resulted in blurry vision and increased sensitivity to glare, which interfered with some aspects of their everyday life, notably driving a motor vehicle. However, the majority of patients were prepared to undergo mydriasis at future eye examinations, if required.Conclusions: Practitioners should not refrain from performing mydriatic fundus examinations simply because of a perceived inconvenience to their patients. Nevertheless, care should be exercised and patients should be informed of the potential for visual disturbances with mydriasis, especially those patients driving a motor vehicle directly after the examination.

Key concepts: Mydriasis, Pupillary response, Medicine, Pupil, Optometry, Pupil size, Ophthalmology, Ophthalmoscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pupillary dilation: the patient's perspective — Research Paper | ScholarLens