2003The Cancer JournalRequires access

Management of Atypical and Low-Grade Cervical Cytology

Camille A. Falkner, Joan L. Walker

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The finding of atypical and low-grade cervical cytology on routine Papanicolaou test is considered problematic for gynecologists and pathologists. The interpretation and management of these cases can be difficult when Papanicolaou test results fall into the Bethesda 2001 categories of atypical squamous cells, atypical squamous cells--cannot rule out high-grade, atypical glandular cells, or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Although liquid-based Papanicolaou tests may have resulted in some improvement in detection, a large amount of variability in cytologic interpretations continues to exist. The recent approval of concurrent use of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing with cytology in the screening of women for cervical neoplasia adds a new dilemma to patient management: What should we do with women who are positive for high-risk human papillomavirus DNA but have negative cervical cytologic results?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The finding of atypical and low-grade cervical cytology on routine Papanicolaou test is considered problematic for gynecologists and pathologists. The interpretation and management of these cases can be difficult when Papanicolaou test results fall into the Bethesda 2001 categories of atypical squamous cells, atypical squamous cells--cannot rule out high-grade, atypical glandular cells, or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Although liquid-based Papanicolaou tests may have resulted in some improvement in detection, a large amount of variability in cytologic interpretations continues to exist. The recent approval of concurrent use of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing with cytology in the screening of women for cervical neoplasia adds a new dilemma to patient management: What should we do with women who are positive for high-risk human papillomavirus DNA but have negative cervical cytologic results?

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The finding of atypical and low-grade cervical cytology on routine Papanicolaou test is considered problematic for gynecologists and pathologists. The interpretation and management of these cases can be difficult when Papanicolaou test results fall into the Bethesda 2001 categories of atypical squamous cells, atypical squamous cells--cannot rule out high-grade, atypical glandular cells, or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Although liquid-based Papanicolaou tests may have resulted in some improvement in detection, a large amount of variability in cytologic interpretations continues to exist. The recent approval of concurrent use of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing with cytology in the screening of women for cervical neoplasia adds a new dilemma to patient management: What should we do with women who are positive for high-risk human papillomavirus DNA but have negative cervical cytologic results?

Key concepts: Papanicolaou stain, Cytology, Squamous intraepithelial lesion, Papanicolaou Test, Medicine, Human papillomavirus, Bethesda system, Cervical cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Management of Atypical and Low-Grade Cervical Cytology — Research Paper | ScholarLens