2003Oceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492)Requires access

Bound waves and sea-surface slopes

William J. Plant

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

For several years, suggestions have been made that sea surface roughness cannot be adequately explained in terms of weakly interacting, wind-generated waves. Rather, ripples that are generated by longer waves, are tilted by them, and are moving at nearly the speed of the longer wave have been postulated to coexist with waves that are directly generated by the wind, that is, with free waves. Effects of these bound waves have been detected in microwave backscatter on the ocean and in wind-wave tanks, and in surface-slope probability density functions (PDFs) in wind-wave tanks. Here we show that Cox and Munk's sea-surface slope PDFs are fully consistent with this bound wave/free wave model. From the fits of these PDFs to the model, we conclude that probabilities of finding bound waves are nearly the same in wind-wave tanks and on the ocean, and both are much higher than the probability of observing whitecaps. Variances of both bound and free waves are larger on the ocean than in tanks.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For several years, suggestions have been made that sea surface roughness cannot be adequately explained in terms of weakly interacting, wind-generated waves. Rather, ripples that are generated by longer waves, are tilted by them, and are moving at nearly the speed of the longer wave have been postulated to coexist with waves that are directly generated by the wind, that is, with free waves. Effects of these bound waves have been detected in microwave backscatter on the ocean and in wind-wave tanks, and in surface-slope probability density functions (PDFs) in wind-wave tanks. Here we show that Cox and Munk's sea-surface slope PDFs are fully consistent with this bound wave/free wave model. From the fits of these PDFs to the model, we conclude that probabilities of finding bound waves are nearly the same in wind-wave tanks and on the ocean, and both are much higher than the probability of observing whitecaps. Variances of both bound and free waves are larger on the ocean than in tanks.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For several years, suggestions have been made that sea surface roughness cannot be adequately explained in terms of weakly interacting, wind-generated waves. Rather, ripples that are generated by longer waves, are tilted by them, and are moving at nearly the speed of the longer wave have been postulated to coexist with waves that are directly generated by the wind, that is, with free waves. Effects of these bound waves have been detected in microwave backscatter on the ocean and in wind-wave tanks, and in surface-slope probability density functions (PDFs) in wind-wave tanks. Here we show that Cox and Munk's sea-surface slope PDFs are fully consistent with this bound wave/free wave model. From the fits of these PDFs to the model, we conclude that probabilities of finding bound waves are nearly the same in wind-wave tanks and on the ocean, and both are much higher than the probability of observing whitecaps. Variances of both bound and free waves are larger on the ocean than in tanks.

Key concepts: Wind wave, Surface wave, Geology, Free surface, Surface roughness, Wind speed, Wave height, Breaking wave

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bound waves and sea-surface slopes — Research Paper | ScholarLens