2003Journal of Computer Assisted TomographyOpen access

Interstitial Magnetic Resonance Lymphography: Comparative Animal Study of Gadofluorine 8 and Gadolinium Diethylenetriamine-Pentaacetic Acid

Morio Shimada, Kohki Yoshikawa, Tsunetoku Suganuma, Hideki KAYANUMA, Yusuke Inoue, Kuniko Ito, Atsushi Senoo, Sanshin Hayashi

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the usefulness of gadofluorine 8 (G8) and gadolinium diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) for interstitial magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL). METHOD: Phantom imaging studies were conducted with G8 and Gd-DTPA corresponding to 0.1-0.005 micromol Gd/mL, and signal intensity was measured. Popliteal lymph node (PLN) accumulation was investigated in rabbits. Imaging was performed before and after subcutaneous administration of G8 (50 micromol Gd/mL) and Gd-DTPA (50 micromol Gd/mL). Contrast enhancement ratio measurements of PLN were determined both prior to and following the administration. RESULTS: Signal intensity of phantom for G8 are higher than those for Gd-DTPA from 0.1 to 0.002 micromol Gd/mL (P < 0.0001). Imaging after 5 minutes can clearly detect PLN accumulation on two contrast agents. Nevertheless, PLN accumulation of Gd-DTPA disappeared after about 30 minutes. A statistically significant difference between G8 and Gd-DTPA can be seen from 5 to 90 minutes in CER (P < 0.0001). PLN became clearly visible at 5 minutes after the injection of G8 and Gd-DTPA. Nevertheless, PLN accumulation of Gd-DTPA disappeared at 30 minutes. Otherwise, PLN accumulation of G8 continued up to 90 minutes. CONCLUSION: These studies indicated that G8 was more suitable than Gd-DTPA as a contrast agent for interstitial MRL up to 90 minutes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: We evaluated the usefulness of gadofluorine 8 (G8) and gadolinium diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) for interstitial magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL). METHOD: Phantom imaging studies were conducted with G8 and Gd-DTPA corresponding to 0.1-0.005 micromol Gd/mL, and signal intensity was measured. Popliteal lymph node (PLN) accumulation was investigated in rabbits. Imaging was performed before and after subcutaneous administration of G8 (50 micromol Gd/mL) and Gd-DTPA (50 micromol Gd/mL). Contrast enhancement ratio measurements of PLN were determined both prior to and following the administration. RESULTS: Signal intensity of phantom for G8 are higher than those for Gd-DTPA from 0.1 to 0.002 micromol Gd/mL (P < 0.0001). Imaging after 5 minutes can clearly detect PLN accumulation on two contrast agents. Nevertheless, PLN accumulation of Gd-DTPA disappeared after about 30 minutes. A statistically significant difference between G8 and Gd-DTPA can be seen from 5 to 90 minutes in CER (P < 0.0001). PLN became clearly visible at 5 minutes after the injection of G8 and Gd-DTPA. Nevertheless, PLN accumulation of Gd-DTPA disappeared at 30 minutes. Otherwise, PLN accumulation of G8 continued up to 90 minutes. CONCLUSION: These studies indicated that G8 was more suitable than Gd-DTPA as a contrast agent for interstitial MRL up to 90 minutes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the usefulness of gadofluorine 8 (G8) and gadolinium diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) for interstitial magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL). METHOD: Phantom imaging studies were conducted with G8 and Gd-DTPA corresponding to 0.1-0.005 micromol Gd/mL, and signal intensity was measured. Popliteal lymph node (PLN) accumulation was investigated in rabbits. Imaging was performed before and after subcutaneous administration of G8 (50 micromol Gd/mL) and Gd-DTPA (50 micromol Gd/mL). Contrast enhancement ratio measurements of PLN were determined both prior to and following the administration. RESULTS: Signal intensity of phantom for G8 are higher than those for Gd-DTPA from 0.1 to 0.002 micromol Gd/mL (P < 0.0001). Imaging after 5 minutes can clearly detect PLN accumulation on two contrast agents. Nevertheless, PLN accumulation of Gd-DTPA disappeared after about 30 minutes. A statistically significant difference between G8 and Gd-DTPA can be seen from 5 to 90 minutes in CER (P < 0.0001). PLN became clearly visible at 5 minutes after the injection of G8 and Gd-DTPA. Nevertheless, PLN accumulation of Gd-DTPA disappeared at 30 minutes. Otherwise, PLN accumulation of G8 continued up to 90 minutes. CONCLUSION: These studies indicated that G8 was more suitable than Gd-DTPA as a contrast agent for interstitial MRL up to 90 minutes.

Key concepts: Gadolinium, Medicine, Magnetic resonance imaging, Diethylenetriamine, Nuclear medicine, Gadolinium DTPA, Pentetic acid, Contrast (vision)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interstitial Magnetic Resonance Lymphography: Comparative Animal Study of Gadofluorine 8 and Gadolinium Diethylenetriamine-Pentaacetic Acid — Research Paper | ScholarLens