1995•Acta RadiologicaRequires access

In Vivo Thrombogenicity of Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging Catheters

K.-D. Bolz, A. Nordby

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the frequency and significance of thrombus formation on the surface of intravascular ultrasound (US) imaging catheters. The investigation includes 63 consecutive patients who underwent 32 arterial and 38 venous intravascular procedures. At the end of the imaging procedure the US findings were observed during withdrawal of the catheter into the introducer sheath. Thrombus formation was demonstrated in 5 (7%). The largest thrombus fragments had a cross-sectional dimension of 2.2 x 1.0 mm. There was a significant correlation between the incidence of thrombus formation and the occurrence of malign neoplastic disease. No relation was found between the frequency of thrombus formation and the duration of the imaging procedure or the type of US catheter. It is concluded that the thrombogenicity of intravascular US imaging devices is not higher than that of conventional angiographic catheters. The observed "pull-out" thrombi were small and it is unlikely that they could have any clinical significance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study evaluates the frequency and significance of thrombus formation on the surface of intravascular ultrasound (US) imaging catheters. The investigation includes 63 consecutive patients who underwent 32 arterial and 38 venous intravascular procedures. At the end of the imaging procedure the US findings were observed during withdrawal of the catheter into the introducer sheath. Thrombus formation was demonstrated in 5 (7%). The largest thrombus fragments had a cross-sectional dimension of 2.2 x 1.0 mm. There was a significant correlation between the incidence of thrombus formation and the occurrence of malign neoplastic disease. No relation was found between the frequency of thrombus formation and the duration of the imaging procedure or the type of US catheter. It is concluded that the thrombogenicity of intravascular US imaging devices is not higher than that of conventional angiographic catheters. The observed "pull-out" thrombi were small and it is unlikely that they could have any clinical significance.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study evaluates the frequency and significance of thrombus formation on the surface of intravascular ultrasound (US) imaging catheters. The investigation includes 63 consecutive patients who underwent 32 arterial and 38 venous intravascular procedures. At the end of the imaging procedure the US findings were observed during withdrawal of the catheter into the introducer sheath. Thrombus formation was demonstrated in 5 (7%). The largest thrombus fragments had a cross-sectional dimension of 2.2 x 1.0 mm. There was a significant correlation between the incidence of thrombus formation and the occurrence of malign neoplastic disease. No relation was found between the frequency of thrombus formation and the duration of the imaging procedure or the type of US catheter. It is concluded that the thrombogenicity of intravascular US imaging devices is not higher than that of conventional angiographic catheters. The observed "pull-out" thrombi were small and it is unlikely that they could have any clinical significance.

Key concepts: Thrombogenicity, Medicine, Intravascular ultrasound, In vivo, Ultrasound, Radiology, Ultrasound imaging, Catheter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
In Vivo Thrombogenicity of Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging Catheters — Research Paper | ScholarLens