1990•Investigative RadiologyRequires access

Neural Networks in Radiologic Diagnosis; II. Interpretation of Neonatal Chest Radiographs

George W. Gross, John M. Boone, VALERIE GRECO-HUNT, BRUCE GREENBERG

Open publisher page 69 citations

Abstract

Gross GW, Boone JM, Greco-Hunt V, Greenberg B. Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis: II. interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 1990;25:1017–1023. A neural network (NN) system was trained to choose one or more diagnoses from a list of 12 possible diagnoses, based on 21 radiographic observations made on each of a series of neonatal chest radiographs. Initially, an experienced pediatric radiologist provided both the radiographic observations and ranked differential diagnoses for each of 77 neonatal chest radiographs in the preliminary phase used to train the NN. Subsequently, two pediatric radiologists (one of whom provided the initial training-phase data) independently read a series of 103 neonatal chest radiographs (different from the training set) and compiled a list of radiographic findings and differential diagnoses for each radiograph. The trained NN was then asked to provide a list of differential diagnoses for each case from the radiologists' lists of findings. Agreement between the network and each radiologist independently was greater than between the two radiologist independently was greater than between the two radiologists. both the positive and negative agreement between the network and either radiologist was greater than the inter-radiologist agreements for most of the diagnostic endpoints.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Gross GW, Boone JM, Greco-Hunt V, Greenberg B. Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis: II. interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 1990;25:1017–1023. A neural network (NN) system was trained to choose one or more diagnoses from a list of 12 possible diagnoses, based on 21 radiographic observations made on each of a series of neonatal chest radiographs. Initially, an experienced pediatric radiologist provided both the radiographic observations and ranked differential diagnoses for each of 77 neonatal chest radiographs in the preliminary phase used to train the NN. Subsequently, two pediatric radiologists (one of whom provided the initial training-phase data) independently read a series of 103 neonatal chest radiographs (different from the training set) and compiled a list of radiographic findings and differential diagnoses for each radiograph. The trained NN was then asked to provide a list of differential diagnoses for each case from the radiologists' lists of findings. Agreement between the network and each radiologist independently was greater than between the two radiologist independently was greater than between the two radiologists. both the positive and negative agreement between the network and either radiologist was greater than the inter-radiologist agreements for most of the diagnostic endpoints.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 69 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Gross GW, Boone JM, Greco-Hunt V, Greenberg B. Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis: II. interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 1990;25:1017–1023. A neural network (NN) system was trained to choose one or more diagnoses from a list of 12 possible diagnoses, based on 21 radiographic observations made on each of a series of neonatal chest radiographs. Initially, an experienced pediatric radiologist provided both the radiographic observations and ranked differential diagnoses for each of 77 neonatal chest radiographs in the preliminary phase used to train the NN. Subsequently, two pediatric radiologists (one of whom provided the initial training-phase data) independently read a series of 103 neonatal chest radiographs (different from the training set) and compiled a list of radiographic findings and differential diagnoses for each radiograph. The trained NN was then asked to provide a list of differential diagnoses for each case from the radiologists' lists of findings. Agreement between the network and each radiologist independently was greater than between the two radiologist independently was greater than between the two radiologists. both the positive and negative agreement between the network and either radiologist was greater than the inter-radiologist agreements for most of the diagnostic endpoints.

Key concepts: Radiography, Medical diagnosis, Medicine, Radiology, Chest radiograph, Differential diagnosis, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Neural Networks in Radiologic Diagnosis; II. Interpretation of Neonatal Chest Radiographs — Research Paper | ScholarLens