2010Forage and GrazinglandsRequires access

Analyses of Louisiana and Mississippi Producers' Samples Reveal Mineral Status of Forages

Kun‐Jun Han, Michael E. McCormick

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Feed value analysis results of Louisiana and Mississippi forage samples categorized into cool-season annual grass (CSAG), cool-season legume forage (CSLF), volunteer warm season grass (VWSG), warm-season annual grass (WSAG), and warm-season perennial grass (WSPG) were reviewed focusing on mineral contents, hypomagnesemic tetany potential, and correlation between the organic nutrients and minerals. Except for high K concentrations in all forage types, macro-mineral concentrations of Ca, P, and Mg were marginal in meeting the mineral requirements of actively growing cattle. Percentages of forage with tetany ratio greater than 2.2 were 20.0, 0.0, 10.3, 4.8, and 4.5% in CSAG, CSLF, VWSG, WSAG, and WSPG, respectively. The correlation coefficients between CP and P, Mg, or K were generally positive while those between NDF and the minerals were mostly negative. Results of producers' forage samples revealed deficiencies of most macro and micro-minerals, and significant chances of hypomagnesemic tetany. Producers' long-term sample analysis results did not provide any strong correlation between minerals and energy or protein. Therefore, sample analysis will be necessary to cover micro and macro minerals in addition to energy and protein. Potassium fertilizer management decisions will need to be made carefully based on analysis results of soil and plant tissue.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Feed value analysis results of Louisiana and Mississippi forage samples categorized into cool-season annual grass (CSAG), cool-season legume forage (CSLF), volunteer warm season grass (VWSG), warm-season annual grass (WSAG), and warm-season perennial grass (WSPG) were reviewed focusing on mineral contents, hypomagnesemic tetany potential, and correlation between the organic nutrients and minerals. Except for high K concentrations in all forage types, macro-mineral concentrations of Ca, P, and Mg were marginal in meeting the mineral requirements of actively growing cattle. Percentages of forage with tetany ratio greater than 2.2 were 20.0, 0.0, 10.3, 4.8, and 4.5% in CSAG, CSLF, VWSG, WSAG, and WSPG, respectively. The correlation coefficients between CP and P, Mg, or K were generally positive while those between NDF and the minerals were mostly negative. Results of producers' forage samples revealed deficiencies of most macro and micro-minerals, and significant chances of hypomagnesemic tetany. Producers' long-term sample analysis results did not provide any strong correlation between minerals and energy or protein. Therefore, sample analysis will be necessary to cover micro and macro minerals in addition to energy and protein. Potassium fertilizer management decisions will need to be made carefully based on analysis results of soil and plant tissue.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Feed value analysis results of Louisiana and Mississippi forage samples categorized into cool-season annual grass (CSAG), cool-season legume forage (CSLF), volunteer warm season grass (VWSG), warm-season annual grass (WSAG), and warm-season perennial grass (WSPG) were reviewed focusing on mineral contents, hypomagnesemic tetany potential, and correlation between the organic nutrients and minerals. Except for high K concentrations in all forage types, macro-mineral concentrations of Ca, P, and Mg were marginal in meeting the mineral requirements of actively growing cattle. Percentages of forage with tetany ratio greater than 2.2 were 20.0, 0.0, 10.3, 4.8, and 4.5% in CSAG, CSLF, VWSG, WSAG, and WSPG, respectively. The correlation coefficients between CP and P, Mg, or K were generally positive while those between NDF and the minerals were mostly negative. Results of producers' forage samples revealed deficiencies of most macro and micro-minerals, and significant chances of hypomagnesemic tetany. Producers' long-term sample analysis results did not provide any strong correlation between minerals and energy or protein. Therefore, sample analysis will be necessary to cover micro and macro minerals in addition to energy and protein. Potassium fertilizer management decisions will need to be made carefully based on analysis results of soil and plant tissue.

Key concepts: Forage, Agronomy, Perennial plant, Tetany, Nutrient, Growing season, Animal science, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analyses of Louisiana and Mississippi Producers' Samples Reveal Mineral Status of Forages — Research Paper | ScholarLens